Quote:
Originally Posted by The Unfan
Actually, I said not all rational lines of thought bring you to the right answer. As to define the right answer, the one which is correct. God can't be both non-existent and existent. If we can find empirical proof for either side, than the other side is wrong. I might be wrong as an atheist, but I doubt it.
|
my bad but you obviously got what i was saying. again though, how do you define the 'correct' answer?
why can't everything be nothing? how do you define existence?
i think the idea that one side has to be wrong so the other is right is one of the major failings of humans.
the easiest analogy i can think of is war. every single person who willingly fought in any war has always been on the same side - the one they believed was right. yet one side always goes down in the history books as having been 'wrong'. were they really wrong or is it just the easiest way of justifying the actions of the victor and their violently enforced view of what is 'right' into the collective psyche of the species?