Music Banter - View Single Post - The Rolling Stones vs. The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2008, 03:42 PM   #492 (permalink)
boo boo
Dr. Prunk
 
boo boo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where the buffalo roam.
Posts: 12,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen View Post
Paul's main skill is as a singer. He was a pretty decent bass player though.
Severe understatement. He played basslines that were very complex for their time, and he's one of the most innovative bassists in rock music, because of him more bass players began playing more of a leading role in the music. Like John Entwhistle and Chris Squire.

Abbey Road alone is a great bass album, and most of that was done in one take.

Quote:
It is also important to avoid judging the Beatles' instrumental skills on the basis of the years where they were no longer touring.
You don't have to. You could base it on their early material as well.

Quote:
A lot of people make this mistake. Hundreds of hours in the studio can make George Harrison sound like Jimmy Hendrix.
He didn't sound like Jimi Hendrix, and you can tell his solos weren't spliced up because they were simple and to the point and he could play live just like he could in the studio.

Seriously. Stop giving George Martin credit for EVERYTHING.
__________________
It's only knock n' knowall, but I like it

http://www.last.fm/user/kingboobs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strummer521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill View Post
I only listen to Santana when I feel like being annoyed.
I only listen to you talk when I want to hear Emo performed acapella.
boo boo is offline