Music Banter - View Single Post - The Ultimate Hipster Playlist / Good Albums that Suck Because You Exist
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2008, 12:35 PM   #59 (permalink)
jackhammer
Ba and Be.
 
jackhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: This Is England
Posts: 17,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucifer_sam View Post


9. Pink Floyd - Animals (1977)

Prior to 1999, Animals was a great album. It has one of the strongest themes in music and represents a huge cry for the victims of industrialization and imperialism. It was released during an era in which people weren't sure when the end would come; Roger Waters' lyrics fall heavily upon politicians in England and across the world, and he used impressive symbolism to deliver the message. Although the album was primarily a work of Waters, Gilmour helped craft the iconoclastic "Dogs" and contributed some of his most expressive guitar work throughout the entire album. Overall, it was a fantastic album, and this alone could have immortalized Pink Floyd in the annals of musical history. And I love it.

But between its release and the new millennium, there wasn't much hype for Animals. Yes, it sold well. It achieved a peak position of #2 on the US Billboard charts and stayed on for quite some time. But it came during a period of transition -- between the bittersweet Wish You Were Here and the cult classic The Wall. Not to mention the preceding success of DSOTM kind of capped its presence. It was great, but not that great.* Then, come 1999, something so blatantly uncalled for and irretrievable happened.

Pitchfork reviewed it.

It was a tiny review, not even four hundred words. But the author, James P. Wisdom (irony at its best), decided to usher in a new era of mind-numbing collective consciousness: he gave it a ten. By Pitchfork standards, a ten basically means that even the silence separating songs is enough to deliver an erection for the world at large. And you know what? All those people, all those sheep, the ones that loved Dark Side of the Moon and felt ambivalent towards the 1977 album, two paragraphs beforehand -- now loved Animals. That was it. That's all that happened to make this album such an icon amongst kids everywhere who happened to skim the boldfaced ratings at the top of the page.

Today, I can hardly hear the beauty in Dark Side without having a brainless maggot quip about how "it's no Animals." I imagine on that fateful day, the author was sitting on a plush armchair laughing his head off. Yessss, he says. Let's make them trip over themselves. They thought Pink Floyd was good, but they never realized they were a ten!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Maybe Pitchforks review awoken people up to the fact that it is a brilliant album? I have never been near pitchfork and I don't think it is as huge in Britain as the U.S. Are you bitter because more people like one of your favourite albums or the fact that people are sheep? Guess what? They have always been sheep. Even though it is my all time favourite album (and has been for 20 years), a rise in in popularity or a dip in appreciation does'nt matter a jot. I have far better things to worry about than the mainstreams fickle tastes.
__________________

“A cynic by experience, a romantic by inclination and now a hero by necessity.”
jackhammer is offline   Reply With Quote