Music Banter - View Single Post - 10 Reasons Why The Rolling Stones Were Better Than The Beatles
View Single Post
Old 11-17-2008, 11:59 AM   #258 (permalink)
Veronica Lodge
Music Addict
 
Veronica Lodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Riverdale.
Posts: 174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by petebragansa View Post
the Beatles were produced by George Martin, whereas the Stones produced themselves. This is a crucial difference in why they are more real. In fact, this is the schism in music overall: producers and anyone not in the band usually ruin the band. Then again, Beatles are great, but as for "realness", you can't beat Exile and Sticky Fingers, two raw albums that the Beatles couldn't equal....even on their last record...where they tried!
- Peter Bragansa
George Martin was a genius. Hello, greatest producer of all time. Hi, SIR GEORGE MARTIN.

Do you not like Jeff Beck? Or James Bond films? Those also have George Martin all over them.

What the hell have the Stones ever done, other than NOT STOPPED TOURING.

Blech, over it.
__________________
- Veronica Lodge -


Yes, that IS what I said.
Veronica Lodge is offline   Reply With Quote