Quote:
Originally Posted by AsherM
Do you guys consider a particular band alternative because they have a fairly unique sound, or do you prefer to base it on commercial success (or lack there of) and accessibility?
For example, I like Red Hot Chili Peppers, and refer to them as "alternative" rock, but I know many people wouldn't because RHCP is hugely successful now.
Just curious about your opinions on the subject.
|
I think the Chili Peppers would be a bad example, as they've opted for a more mainstream sound as of late. But I would tend to agree with PMO, Alternative is a very non-descriptive title, encompassing everything from Death Cab to Radiohead to Of Montreal.