i'm getting a new guitar soon. i have 3 options:
1) buy a jackson kelly
2) buy a gibson explorer
3) buy a Chandler San Fran explorer
advantages and disadvantages:
1) jackson is better for metal (which is what i'm getting the guitar for) plays nice sounds great and is reasonably priced (i can get it NOW)
2) i've always wanted the explorer, its a sick guitar, plays amazingly, is more versatile than the jackson but not as good for metal and i'll have to save up for a lot longer.
3) the chandler explorer is sick. it plays nice (altho the neck is a bit chunky) and is the same price as the jackson, but the bridge and tailpiece are made poorly and i'd have to replace them.
your thoughts?
|