Hold the bull**** train right there..
First off, in the way early 90's Saddam did have WMD's and a ton of them. He was lobbing scuds at the Israelis and the we wouldn't let Israel retaliate. He had WMD's in the late 90's when he kicked the UN inspectors out, he had WMD's in 2002 when he let them back in. Now we're having to use a bit of effort to find them now. Whys that? Because Bush gave him way too much time, Syria rings a bell...
I believe you mentioned earlier that the USA does not have the right to go tell everyone what to do. Well then the UN does? Now you're going to say the UN is allowed to do that because it's a bunch of countries collectively. Which is true, excluding the fact that there is always some at the top with supreme control, which just happens to be that freak from Africa. The UN needs to shut the hell up and the USA needs to kick them out and stop giving the UN money (Which Bush has initiated, thankfully).
Winning the election? Total bull****. You're from the UK as I understand? Well here in the USA we have this thing called the electoral college. Basically there's 2 votes in each state. This is to prevent something like say California being able to decide the whole election for the rest of the country due to their high capita. Now for some reason the Democrats are begining to scream about this, even though this is what greatly helped Clinton in the 96 election against Bob Dole...
What's funny is you call him a fool. He's only a fool because you don't agree with him, so what does that make you?
Lying to his own people? Well it's funny you mention that, because the CIA (which is headed up by the former CEO of Citibank) is the one IIRC that told Bush about the whole WMD thing. The blame should actually be shifted to them more than Bush (if there really is any justified blame). By the way, do we not remember a particular President who was getting head and then lied about it on National TV? Or how about smoking pot? or or...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2tonelol
Right then(sleeves rolled up!!).
That man Bush(and Blair) has told the world the this Saddam man had to go.Nothing wrong with that,he was an evil man that,as they say here,deserved a slap!
Why then did we first of all have to have the lies of WMD? That smacks of a political leader that thinks that his people are to dumb to understand the whole truth of the matter.Even worse that he thinks he can get away with 'sexing up'the facts to suit his needs.What other issues do you think he may 'bend' the truth on to get his way?
When the facts come out that basically they did 'sex up' the argument to got to war they tried to fall back on an old and trusted excuse......Well he WAS in breach of UN directive14 blah blah,so what they decided to do was as the UN to go to war with Iraq the UN said no and they go ahead anyway!!! Now who's gone against the UN? How comes if Saddam does it he's some monster that needs kicking out but when Bush/Blair ignore UN requests nothing is said?
Bush and Blair have proved themselves to be self righteous,dishonest bully's.Not a million miles from Saddam is it?
George w Bush (i think we all know what the W stands for,see timberlake licks balls thread!) also has the dubious honour of probably being the only president of the states without actually winning the election.The whole 'chad' thing,though i cant blame Bush for this,it is still a dodgy result that put him in the most powerful job in the world.
I know that Kerry is probably no better,unfortunately there does only seem to be a handful of genuine politicians around the world,but what America can't do is allow a man who has lied to his own people and the rest of the world to get another term,otherwise he will see no end to his power and then you will be in the crap because he will walk over anyone just to get what is good for him and no one else.
Lose the fool now before he loses the plot for real!
|