Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepy jack
If you're going to criticize me for not understanding the Constitution then maybe you should actually look into a bit more and realize the "voter" was always the elite, educated, affluent, etc in those times or to put it in shorter terms Marx's bourgeois. The Founding Fathers idea of how it was supposed to work had nothing to do with a "voter legislated mandate" and everything to do with the bourgeois and Congress doing whatever the hell they wanted. Which is more or less how the system operates now.
|
What does any of this have to do with anything we are talking about.
If I was trying to argue with you I'd simply say "No taxation without representation" (just about) everyone would know what I was referring to and you'd (have to...?)see how simple the point I was making was.
I fully acknowledged the poor presentation of my previous post to specifically avoid this response from you.
I'm not going to debate or discuss with you if your goal is simply to win an argument by changing the subject multiple times based on wild interpretations of otherwise rational statements or exhausting your combatant with your stubborn will and foolish teenage angst.
Have you been well?