I apoligize for bringing that up when i didn't actually have any current refrences to back it up... if it was true (which its not) then it would be philisophical, but moving on...
Until we accept a definition of reality, we cant "prove" anything. Proof only exists if we accept it as truth, same as religion etc. There are of course differences, and they require different types of faith, but nevertheless, both can be "disproved" by simply accepting a different definition of reality. I'm fairly certain we'll never really understand. But, just because we can't understand doesn't mean we shouldn't try.
"I think therefore I am" is probably the most basic realities I accept. everything else goes from there.
__________________
"Not remotely! Because iocaine comes from Australia, as everyone knows. And Australia is entirely peopled with criminals. And criminals are used to having people not trust them as you are not trusted by me, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you."
|