Quote:
Originally Posted by Lateralus
To be honest I don't know much about how the constitution or how politics work in the United States so chances are I'm mistaken about my beliefs. Our Prime Minister must work hand in hand with parliament, and parliament has the power to convene elections for a new prime minister if they do not believe in the decisions the prime minister has made. I thought the president does not have to answer to the senate or the house unless he or she has committed an illegal act. Which essentially I thought means more power is given to one singular person. I may be wrong, so apologies if I am.
This may be indeed colouring my view on a republic, but not to any significant extent. My main argument on not becoming a republic is the fact that there are more positives than negatives about being affiliated with Britain, and also that everything is working fine the way it is now so why try to change it.
|
Yeah I mean as far as how it pertains to Australia, I wouldn't think I could comment. We're designed in America to embrace individualism and freedom, so i think we're naturally inclined to make decisions moving toward no political ties.
That being said, if nothing will change, then why not stand alone? Does becoming a Republican change any internal political processes?
As far as how the American Presidency works, they basically control the military and can veto legislation, but Congress (senators included) creates legislation. The president requires the house of Congress to do anything.