Quote:
Originally Posted by mojopinuk
This is insane. So what, they cant test the guy because there is no evidence substantial enough to invade on his private life and test him? Is that right? So what actually does happen in these circumstances then? I assume this is the case because she cant tell them for sure who it was and actually accuse him of anything? How do they know who it was?
|
I have no idea. Apparently he is refusing to be tested and denies the accusation so it's basically her word against his. I wonder if they can test him, even without sufficient evidence? I have no idea how the law works!