like every other religious 'debate' i've ever seen it still boils down to a very simple premise.
do you choose to believe in something or do you choose to believe in nothing.
whichever side of that divide you choose to be on is irrelevant, as neither can be infallibly proven; being able to accept your decision without the burden of proof while respecting another individual's choice to hold an opposing view is.
that last bit seems to be the biggest challenge to most of the biggest 'thinkers' i've ever had to deal with.
__________________
i am the universe
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandteacher1
I type whicked fast,
|
|