Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan
I don't think he ever molested any children. Innocent until proven guilty anyone? He was acquitted both times and it's obvious if you examine the cases at all that it was exploitation. If you're accused of something that doesn't make you guilty. That's the difference between our "civilized" legal process and the witch hunts of Salem.
|
I'm not saying he did, but I don't trust the American Legal system at all. Especially when dealing with extremely rich people. It's always a possibility. I mean, he had enough money to buy the boys into his home in the first place. He may have only done it because he felt sympathy for his own ****ed up childhood. I don't know, but it's kind of one of those things were you cant quite place it as cut, an dry.
Albeit, as mentioned, he got way to much focus. Gary Glitter got practically none, and I don't think we can argue at this point on Glitter.