Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty
I understand the analogy, I just don't think it's a good one. He asked me a question, I answered it. It's too bad he wasn't satisfied with how I chose to answer, but those things happen I guess and since the discussion is over I guess it doesn't matter much.
I am satisfied with your answer. I remember what the post said and exactly where it was and it seemed to be poking fun towards me a bit. But i didn't take it very serious, which is why I ignored it and never responded. I was just reading back through a few pages and noticed it vanished. If it merged, the entire post that was merged was erased. So it was basically just deleted. But it's all good. Just a bit annoying to see posts disappear I guess.
|
The analogy itself is supported by your position regarding whether answers need to be acceptable or not. I personally think you can answer "strawberry" for any question asked of you, and make just as much sense as you've been making, in context with the questions being asked.
The goal of all the questions wasn't to set you at odds with a particular opinion. They were to get you to make some sense in regard to the question, to which you've only replied "strawberry", as far as most of us are concerned.
What did the post say?
If it's a good post, then I'll have to repost it, having had its fate determined by an errant merging mishap and some of the wind taken out of me.
