Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Album Reviews (https://www.musicbanter.com/album-reviews/)
-   -   Nirvana- Nevermind- 1991 (https://www.musicbanter.com/album-reviews/58928-nirvana-nevermind-1991-a.html)

RMR 10-12-2011 05:39 PM

Nirvana- Nevermind- 1991
 
http://rushmusicreviews.com/wp-conte..._Nevermind.jpg
Nirvana Nevermind- 1991
RMR Album Rating- 7
http://rushmusicreviews.com/wp-conte.../10/7-Star.gif

Contrary to popular belief, Nirvana didn’t want to be the poster boys for grunge music.

In fact, after their debut album “Bleach,” they were actually trying to move away from the grunge sound and create something a little more mainstream, so they certainly succeed with “Nevermind,” through which much of the world heard a slightly toned down version of grunge music for the first time.

Nirvana’s grunge movement, with help from the other 3 major bands of grunge (Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, and Alice in Chains) can be thought of as a cleansing period in rock music. It’s pretty interesting if you think about it, but every time Rock music gets a little too big for itself, a movement of music comes around and cleans it up and resets it. This first happened in the late 70’s when the punk bands first came on to the scene. As much as I hate to admit it, some progressive rock bands had just become way too overblown. So, the Sex Pistols and the Ramones can in and straightened things out. The same thing occurred in the 80’s. AOR and hair-metal bands were filling stadiums, and they had just become way too over the top, so Nirvana and the other grunge bands came in and brought some equilibrium and sensibility back to rock fans. As an example of this, I vividly remember the first time I saw the video for “Smells like Teen Spirit” on MTV. It came on right after the video for Motely Crue’s “Home Sweet Home.” Although “Home Sweet Home” was originally released in 1985, they were airing the video because the Crue had just released their “Decade of Decadence” compilation album. Anyway, they followed Motley’s video with Nirvana’s “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” and the contrast was bitingly apparent. The Crue looked more like comic book characters than rock stars. Conversely, Nirvana just looked real, and more importantly, they sounded real.

The sound of the whole album is pretty consistent, and every song pretty much follows the same pattern, with the exception of the mostly acoustic “Polly,” which closes out the first half of the album. The best description of “Nevermind’s” sound is an album that it is “doused in mud” and “soaked in bleach,” and I think this is a fitting description, being that it’s a line from “Come as You Are,” which was one of the biggest singles from the album. Plus, describing “Nevermind’s” sound in this way seems fitting because the sound of the album is definitely dirty and grungy, but at the same time, the album is cleansing (or bleaching) the rest of the rock world from the comic book rock that had dominated the 80’s, so the juxtaposition is just perfect.

As for the songs, all the big hitters are on the first half of the album. “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” “In Bloom,” Come as You Are,” and “Lithium” were all released as massively successful singles, and they all had videos in heavy rotation on MTV. “Smells Like Teen Spirit” was the first and the biggest of the four singles, but it’s kind of ironic that the song that brought grunge to the mainstream and cleansed rock of overblown AOR and hair-metal bands borrowed its main riff from Boston— the king of AOR bands. Cobain has even stated that “Smells like Teen Spirit’s” main riff was a play on Boston’s “More than a Feeling” (a song that he loved). The riffs are not exactly the same, but they are very similar. The original Boston riff starts at 42-seconds in “More Than a Feeling,” and Nirvana’s grungier version of the riff starts at 8 seconds in “Smell’s Like Teen Spirit." Either way, all four of those lead singles are great, and they will be forever synonymous with grunge music.

Although the second half of the album doesn’t get nearly as much attention as the first half, it has some great songs as well. It opens with “Territorial Pissings,” which is one of heaviest songs on the album. There’s also “Drain You” and “I’m on a Plain,” which are my two favorite songs from the album. Cobain wrote “Drain You” about his girlfriend Toby Veil. I love the opening lyrics of “One baby to another says/ I’m lucky to have met you/ I don’t care what you think/ unless it is about me/ it is now my duty to completely drain you.” Cobain’s and Veil’s relationship was coming to an end, and I think the lyrics illustrate a bitter sweet acceptance of this; their relationship started out well, but now it is just completely draining them. “I’m on a Plain,” is extremely catchy, but its drug inspired lyrics are some of Cobain’s most telling and sad, as the song opens with Cobain singing that “I’ll start this off without any words/ I got so high I scratched ’till I bled/ I love myself better than you/ I know it’s wrong so what should I do?”. I take the “you” in the song to be Heroin. It is very similar to Izzy Stradlin’s song “I Think About You” from GNR’s “Appetite for Destruction,” where it seems like a love song on the surface, but the “you” in the song (the object of Stradlin’s love) is actually heroin. To close out on the topic of songs, they’re all good; they’re all catchy, and they completely set the stage for the outpour of grunge and alternative rock that immersed the music scene throughout the 90’s.

I started out by saying that Nirvana didn’t want to be the poster boys for grunge, but they certainly brought it to the mainstream, and the impact and change that they brought on to the music scene was one of the biggest in all of rock’s history— in that it completely changed the direction and sound of rock music, and bands very rarely do that.

Ska Lagos Jew Sun Ra 10-12-2011 05:54 PM

I'm glad you didn't give this album a 9 or a 10, and I'd like to say a good write-up. Albeit, I vastly disagree with the point saying that the album stays consistent. The first half of the album sounds very different than he second. In essence, the first half was an attempt to be really polished with catchy sing-a-long choruses, and the second was an attempt at doing sort of the doomy/punky/sludgy hybrid that typifies 'grunge', and populated pretty much the entirety of Bleach.

I rarely EVER complain about lacking 'consistency', but I feel the problem with this is that it's not an artistic choice, but it feels there's a few songs that they wanted to try to push for hits, and polished up, and the rest they left their raw state. It's like getting a mix tape of 5 Michael Jackson songs, then 5 Sex Pistols songs. As if, they ran out of budget halfway through, and realized that they hype from the videos would sell it well enough to push it out as-is...

Otherwise, it's a decent album. Not legendary as said to be, but better than average. Plagued massively by incompleteness...

RMR 10-12-2011 07:05 PM

Great point...

And, I guess I agree with you regarding the first and second halves of the album sounding different. All the singles were on side-1, and it definitely has a more glossy and polished sound to it, as you point out.

I guess what I meant was that the song structures (rather than the sound) are pretty consistent throughout the whole album, which I think they are. Side-2 just doesn't have the gloss that Side-1 has.

It kind of reminds me of "Appetite for Destruction" in terms of album halves. The first half of Appetite has "Jungle," "Nightrain," "Brownstone," and "Paradise City." All the singles, with the exception of "Child," which was on the second side. Side-2 of "Appetite" has a different feel to it (just like "Nevermind"), but the song structures are pretty much the same, and I've actually grown to like side-2 of "Appetite" better than side-1.

The Batlord 11-22-2011 11:09 AM

My spammer sense is tingling.

Ferrari5180 11-22-2011 05:54 PM

I think your review is spot on and honest. I must admit that I did not listen to Nevermind until about 5 years ago when I started expanding my music tastes. The music appealed to me very much. However, as stated by others, the first half of the album is more polished than the second half. I remember hearing these polished songs and then all of a sudden hitting a wave of "rough" sounding music. I still enjoyed it though. I would have to say that my favorite song on the album is Lithium, just listened to it so much!

Black Francis 11-23-2011 06:51 PM

Nevermind is very vocal driven, the songs are simple so kurt's presence are the main appeal of the album.

take lithium & Come as you are And In bloom..

those songs are pure kurt, they become catchy not so much for the rhythm just by his charismatic presence, by the feeling portrayed in the songs.. a deep self-destructive poet rockstar fitting for the Generation X underachievers.. so in a way, Kurt came first, and the songs came 2nd, especially so in this album, yet, you got songs like "Drain you" & "Lounge Act" (both my favs)wich seemed to be another aspect of Kurt just like "About a girl" Was in bleach, i personally picked those 2 you may think otherwise, it showed the band had depth. that all songs are not gonna be another "Teen Spirit"
Overall the album is consistent yet with subtle differences among the songs.. the guitar riffs are extremely simple, the chord progressions striped down basic "Verse 4 notes" & "Chorus 2 notes" (for the most part) the drums are Powerhouse Drums, the bass almost unnoticed.

RVCA 11-23-2011 10:56 PM

I just listened to this again today. Man, you can really tell how the first half of the album is a Pixies rip-off and then the second half is a Melvins rip-off.

Howard the Duck 11-23-2011 11:04 PM

i don't like it as much as Bleach

and that's mostly because Bleach sounds like a Melvins album

Odyshape 11-24-2011 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RVCA (Post 1123421)
I just listened to this again today. Man, you can really tell how the first half of the album is a Pixies rip-off and then the second half is a Melvins rip-off.

I never really thought that to be honest. I always thought kurt cobain was full of crap in a lot of ways. Especially when he made comparisons between his music and the pixies. I understand some matters of dynamics but the connection I thought wasn't really there as much as kurt professed. I am in no way an anti kurt cobain person in fact I have found a huge amount of good music through him but I don't really think he always knew what he was talking about.

Btw this is all based on the assumption that you have heard about the influence kurt cobain professed about his love for the pixies.

Goofle 11-24-2011 01:36 PM

I watched that "Last 48 Hours of Kurt Cobain" programme and lost quite a bit of interest in Nirvana. Kurt was an insanely confused individual who seemed completely unaware of his contradictions.

It is a shame what happened because he was actually a decent song writer and had a fantastic voice.

RVCA 11-24-2011 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odyshape (Post 1123570)
I never really thought that to be honest. I always thought kurt cobain was full of crap in a lot of ways. Especially when he made comparisons between his music and the pixies. I understand some matters of dynamics but the connection I thought wasn't really there as much as kurt professed. I am in no way an anti kurt cobain person in fact I have found a huge amount of good music through him but I don't really think he always knew what he was talking about.

Btw this is all based on the assumption that you have heard about the influence kurt cobain professed about his love for the pixies.

Yeah, and he also said that "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was his best attempt at making a catchy, Pixies rip off :p:

Odyshape 11-24-2011 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RVCA (Post 1123640)
Yeah, and he also said that "Smells Like Teen Spirit" was his best attempt at making a catchy, Pixies rip off :p:

Listening to his suicide note was what really made me realize how he had no real consistent view on many things. He seemed to me like a very very insecure person who was stricken with fame and didn't know what to do about it. Hes so ridden with contradictions in what he says I find it astonishing how idolized he can be at times. Its actually quite interesting how unremarkable he was in a lot of ways. Makes him exceptionally human.

Black Francis 11-24-2011 09:43 PM

truth is Nirvana sounds notting like the pixies.. they popularized the pixies "loud, quiet, loud" dynamic the pixies are credited for inventing (though im not sure they did)

Teen spirit? sounds notting like the pixies.. but since they had no reference for that "New dynamic" Except the pixies, they associated it with the Pixies as a vague reference..

look, i love Nirvana but they don't even come close to the Pixies.. Kurt may be more charismatic than Frank, but not more talented than him.. it's always like this.. some band gets popular by emulating underrated cult bands that they love.. there's nothing wrong with appreciating your influences, however, what tends to happen is that in order to reach a wider audience this bands just give a mediocre mainstream safe bet version of that sound.. especially when signing with major labels.

does anyone remember Silver chair? was that not a "Nirvana Version for kids"? lol

(they had a couple of songs that were good though)

Howard the Duck 11-24-2011 09:58 PM

i liked Silverchair

Odyshape 11-25-2011 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis (Post 1123678)
truth is Nirvana sounds notting like the pixies.. they popularized the pixies "loud, quiet, loud" dynamic the pixies are credited for inventing (though im not sure they did)

Teen spirit? sounds notting like the pixies.. but since they had no reference for that "New dynamic" Except the pixies, they associated it with the Pixies as a vague reference..

look, i love Nirvana but they don't even come close to the Pixies.. Kurt may be more charismatic than Frank, but not more talented than him.. it's always like this.. some band gets popular by emulating underrated cult bands that they love.. there's nothing wrong with appreciating your influences, however, what tends to happen is that in order to reach a wider audience this bands just give a mediocre mainstream safe bet version of that sound.. especially when signing with major labels.

does anyone remember Silver chair? was that not a "Nirvana Version for kids"? lol

(they had a couple of songs that were good though)

Frank Black in every way is more charismatic than Kurt Cobain. Kurt Cobain was an insecure angst ridden teenager latching onto unrealistic permanent solutions to finding happiness in ever changing circumstance. Because of this he is ridden with contradiction. He never grew out of this. Frank Black on the other hand from what I know and what I have seen is a much more level headed and really knew what he wanted especially musically.

Interestingly enough I find Kurt Cobain fascinating in many ways. I find it wonderfully human how he is so incredibly normal. At least to me he seems to be just a kid who struggled with his identity. I think that is largely the reason why he always believed he was misunderstood. Its pretty hard to understand him to me not because he actually was different but because he over emphasized his personal perception of being different. I think a lot his fans who he didn't like where just like him. A bunch of kids who never fully realized how normal it is (but not necessarily right) to feel like your different from every body else. I think there is great irony in this. Its almost as if Kurts fans who he would have hated the most would have been the fans he probably would have had the most in common with.

I think if you look between the lines with Kurt Cobain's life you can get a very human real depiction of a celebrity. More than I have ever personally seen.

Electrocuted 11-25-2011 08:50 AM

Your all linking these two bands together because they were around at the same time.

The music is really quite different, but I like both equally :beer:

Salami 11-25-2011 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Il Duce (Post 1123686)
i liked Silverchair

I liked Silverchair for the constantly changing haircuts. Never out of ideas!

Necromancer 11-25-2011 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis (Post 1123678)
does anyone remember Silver chair? was that not a "Nirvana Version for kids"? lol

(they had a couple of songs that were good though)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Il Duce (Post 1123686)
i liked Silverchair

I liked a few singles by Silverchair as well. I always thought that Wes Scantlin (vocals/rhythm guitar) for the band "Puddle Of Mudd" resembled Cobain's voice and style a lot also.

Seether is another band that sounds highly influenced by Nirvana too.

Black Francis 11-26-2011 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Necromancer (Post 1123981)
I liked a few singles by Silverchair as well. I always thought that Wes Scantlin (vocals/rhythm guitar) for the band "Puddle Of Mudd" resembled Cobain's voice and style a lot also.

Seether is another band that sounds highly influenced by Nirvana too.

funny you should mention those 2 bands, the puddle of mudd singer even looks like kurt however the seether singer sounds more like kurt..

but yeah, your right, even Stain & Creed also sound influenced by him..

Necromancer 11-26-2011 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Francis (Post 1124548)
funny you should mention those 2 bands, the puddle of mudd singer even looks like kurt however the seether singer sounds more like kurt..

but yeah, your right, even Stain & Creed also sound influenced by him..

You're right about Staind, I'd have to think about Creed awhile, I always thought they sounded more like a generic brand of Pearl Jam.

PerlJammer 12-05-2011 04:31 PM

Hasn't this overplayed album been talked about enough? If Kurt had lived longer they might have had a legacy worth talking about, but a few studio albums and a trickle of bootlegs gone official release hardly seems like a career.

Necromancer 12-05-2011 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PerlJammer (Post 1128299)
Hasn't this overplayed album been talked about enough? If Kurt had lived longer they might have had a legacy worth talking about, but a few studio albums and a trickle of bootlegs gone official release hardly seems like a career.

I personally always thought that Alice In Chains, were one of the more, superior bands, from the 90s Seattle area.

Is Pearl Jam your favorite?

RMR 12-06-2011 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Necromancer (Post 1128342)
I personally always thought that Alice In Chains, were one of the more, superior bands, from the 90s Seattle area.

I think Alice in Chains is by far the best of the so called big-4 of grunge (Nirvana, Pearl jam, Soundgarden, and AIC). Cantrell is an amazing and underrated song writer, guitarist, and vocalist. Most people didn't notice, but he filled in quite a bit for Layne on vocals when Layne could hold it together. AIC's new album is not bad either.

RMR 12-07-2011 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stringsibanez (Post 1129117)
Isn't reviewing an album this old a little behind the times? I mean, more can be said? Not that I'm entirely objective.. I was listening to this album when it was new.. and I was 7.. Pretty sure I have a nostalgic bias toward loving it.

Are you suggesting that we only post reviews for new albums on this forum?

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 07:57 AM

This isn't my favorite Nirvana album. This is a more polished sound. My favorite is Bleach. The raw sound on that album was great. But the only thing Bleach didn't have was Dave Grohl. Now don't get me wrong I like Nevermind. What a lightning rod Nirvana became because of this album. Whether you liked em' or hated em'. This is still a great album though. Nirvana to me were not grunge. They took there influences and went with it. Nirvana didn't come along to knock the rock bands out of the limelight. The record labels made the decision to go in this direction. Sadly this was the end of things to come for music in a hole. Since then music is all trends. The record labels looking for the next big thing

Janszoon 12-09-2011 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130132)
This isn't my favorite Nirvana album. This is a more polished sound. My favorite is Bleach. The raw sound on that album was great. But the only thing Bleach didn't have was Dave Grohl. Now don't get me wrong I like Nevermind. What a lightning rod Nirvana became because of this album. Whether you liked em' or hated em'. This is still a great album though. Nirvana to me were not grunge. They took there influences and went with it. Nirvana didn't come along to knock the rock bands out of the limelight. The record labels made the decision to go in this direction. Sadly this was the end of things to come for music in a hole. Since then music is all trends. The record labels looking for the next big thing

What does "music in a hole" mean?

Howard the Duck 12-09-2011 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1130134)
What does "music in a hole" mean?

he likes the sound when you put the record on the centrepin

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1130134)
What does "music in a hole" mean?

What I meant was music from that point on became trends. Grunge movement moved into the Alternative movement then became the Nu metal movement. The record labels create these trends to increase sales of albums and music downloads on Itunes. I hate putting labels on music. It's all music. Now I like some popular music. But record labels have a plan for you now. Or let me say The Big Three have a plan for you and that means a two to three year plan for you and will toss you and head onto the next big trend

RMR 12-09-2011 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130166)
Or let me say The Big Three have a plan for you and that means a two to three year plan for you and will toss you and head onto the next big trend

Mike, first, welcome to the forum! Not trying to pick your wording or threads apart, but what does that mean?

Janszoon 12-09-2011 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130166)
What I meant was music from that point on became trends. Grunge movement moved into the Alternative movement then became the Nu metal movement. The record labels create these trends to increase sales of albums and music downloads on Itunes. I hate putting labels on music. It's all music. Now I like some popular music. But record labels have a plan for you now. Or let me say The Big Three have a plan for you and that means a two to three year plan for you and will toss you and head onto the next big trend

I hate to break it to you but pop music was full of record label supported trends long before grunge came along.

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RMR (Post 1130174)
Mike, first, welcome to the forum! Not trying to pick your wording or threads apart, but what does that mean?

Record labels. Trust me when they sign an artist any genre. Have a plan to milk that artist while they can. I work in the music industry. I was a scout for Indy labels. A major label which only consist of three major distribution company's at this point. Record labels in there current form come up with a sales pitch for a artist. Now record labels go out to find something in the most popular trend of the day. Be it whatever they consider to be popular at this time. Record labels do not care about talent anymore. They only see a artist in dollars and cents

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1130184)
I hate to break it to you but pop music was full of record label supported trends long before grunge came along.

Yes it started before Grunge. I know that. It has just gotten worse since then. But if you like music. You don't have to buy what's popular at the time. If you like a certain style there's plenty of avenues now more than ever to discover music

Howard the Duck 12-09-2011 11:48 AM

^^i.e. you were an A&R man?

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Il Duce (Post 1130234)
^^i.e. you were an A&R man?

Yes for smaller Indy labels. I started in music with a band when i was 14 which I was the guitar player in. We played alot of shows in clubs. I decided when I didn't want to play clubs and just struggle by. I first got into management through managing my own band. I wanted to stay in music as a career. So I took a job with a small label out of Chicago. I was a A&R for them for about 2 years before I couldn't deal with it anymore. I currently work in a recording studio here in town and try to help young bands to get gigs and such. I plan on opening my own website for indy bands to sell there muisc as downloads in the near future

RMR 12-09-2011 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130239)
Yes for smaller Indy labels. I started in music with a band when i was 14 which I was the guitar player in. We played alot of shows in clubs. I decided when I didn't want to play clubs and just struggle by. I first got into management through managing my own band. I wanted to stay in music as a career. So I took a job with a small label out of Chicago. I was a A&R for them for about 2 years before I couldn't deal with it anymore. I currently work in a recording studio here in town and try to help young bands to get gigs and such. I plan on opening my own website for indy bands to sell there muisc as downloads in the near future

Cool, again-- welcome to the forum

metalheadmike 12-09-2011 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RMR (Post 1130418)
Cool, again-- welcome to the forum

Thanks man. I'm new to discussing music on forums

bob. 12-10-2011 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130166)
Grunge movement

this always cracks me up :).....i feel like i should attempt to write the grunge manifesto.....it was the media that created the term grunge....in fact its really nothing more than a bit watered down noise rock with pop hooks....which i feel is very obvious in these bands "inspiration"....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Janszoon (Post 1130184)
I hate to break it to you but pop music was full of record label supported trends long before grunge came along.

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130214)
Yes it started before Grunge. I know that. It has just gotten worse since then. But if you like music. You don't have to buy what's popular at the time. If you like a certain style there's plenty of avenues now more than ever to discover music

see i actually feel that this whole "movement" :)....actually helped to take down the pop formula....i mean yes.....record labels went nuts looking for the next nirvana...or the next big sound (see the movie Dig!....it really goes into this)....but here you have unknown and humble "real" bands....as opposed to record label created bands....putting out records with shout out to their friends bands and the awesome bands that they loved and helped mold their sound.....then you have the 15-17 year old target (me) soaking in and looking into ever band mentioned by these people....and thus being fully emerged in underground music.....i went in 20 years ago and have yet to come up for air (save lady gaga i fucking love her)

Quote:

Originally Posted by metalheadmike (Post 1130239)
Yes for smaller Indy labels. I started in music with a band when i was 14 which I was the guitar player in. We played alot of shows in clubs. I decided when I didn't want to play clubs and just struggle by. I first got into management through managing my own band. I wanted to stay in music as a career. So I took a job with a small label out of Chicago. I was a A&R for them for about 2 years before I couldn't deal with it anymore. I currently work in a recording studio here in town and try to help young bands to get gigs and such. I plan on opening my own website for indy bands to sell there muisc as downloads in the near future

....Wax trax?!?!?!

metalheadmike 12-10-2011 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob. (Post 1130648)
this always cracks me up :).....i feel like i should attempt to write the grunge manifesto.....it was the media that created the term grunge....in fact its really nothing more than a bit watered down noise rock with pop hooks....which i feel is very obvious in these bands "inspiration"....





see i actually feel that this whole "movement" :)....actually helped to take down the pop formula....i mean yes.....record labels went nuts looking for the next nirvana...or the next big sound (see the movie Dig!....it really goes into this)....but here you have unknown and humble "real" bands....as opposed to record label created bands....putting out records with shout out to their friends bands and the awesome bands that they loved and helped mold their sound.....then you have the 15-17 year old target (me) soaking in and looking into ever band mentioned by these people....and thus being fully emerged in underground music.....i went in 20 years ago and have yet to come up for air (save lady gaga i fucking love her)



....Wax trax?!?!?!

I worked for smaller label there. But there no longer indy. Won't mention there name. But they were mostly Hardcore Music when I was there


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.