Review: Jethro Tull, Aqualung- 1971
 

http://rushmusicreviews.com/wp-conte...ethro_Aqua.jpg
Jethro Tull Aqualung- 1971
RMR Album Review- 10
http://rushmusicreviews.com/wp-conte...07/10-Star.gif

Classically in through the progressive out door…

Jethro Tull started as a blues band in the late 60’s, and then they transitioned into a classic rock band with their second two albums “Stand Up” and “Benefit.” Then in 1971, they released “Aqualung.”

They started recording “Aqualung” by capitalizing on the strengths and ideas of their previous two classic rock albums, which is why the album is hailed as a classic rock masterpiece, but at the same time, the finished product was bursting with progressive rock tendencies, so it is also hailed as Tull’s first venture into progressive rock.

The most interesting part of the classic rock/ progressive rock juxtaposition on “Aqualung” is that Ian Anderson never considered Jethro Tull a progressive rock band, at least not in the sense that King Crimson, Yes, ELP, and Genesis were considered progressive rock bands, and Ian has stated this in many interviews.

Ian Anderson has always had a penchant for writing complex and creative music, and because “Aqualung” is both complex and creative, it was lumped in with the progressive rock movement. On top of that, “Aqualung” was even called a concept album, to which Ian Anderson was vehemently opposed. So, here comes the ultimate irony. Because “Aqualung” was called a concept album (although it was clearly not in Ian Anderson’s view), it lead Jethro Tull to create the “Thick as a Brick” album a year later to mock concept albums and progressive rock in general. However, by doing this, it made Jethro Tull into a full-fledged progressive rock powerhouse, and “Thick as a Brick” is so good, it really can be considered one of the most classic concept-progressive rock albums ever released.

In 1971, progressive rock was actually a dominant force in popular music and the concept album stamp was being placed on loads of albums during that period, so it’s not surprising that it was placed on “Aqualung.” However, I have to side with Ian on this one. There are some central themes running through the album, but there are several different themes and not just one central concept. You have some songs about the homeless, some songs about organized religion, and then you have some general ballads and rockers that don’t adhere to any running themes. So, it’s definitely not a concept album in my book.

I think Ian took such offense to “Aqualung” being called a concept album because Jethro Tull didn’t set out to write a concept album, or a progressive rock album. With “Aqualung,” Jethro Tull just set out to write a good album. The sound of the album is rooted in classic rock, but it is also bursting with odd time signatures, complex instrumentation, classical piano sections, and dynamic vocal hooks, all of which are hallmarks of progressive rock. However, there is a major difference in how the elements of complexity on “Aqualung” compare to elements of complexity on the other major progressive rock albums released in 1971. I think the other major progressive rock acts knew that they were part of an emerging movement (the progressive rock movement), and they liked creating complex music because it was complex. In other words, the complexity of their music was intentional, whereas I think Jethro Tull was just writing music, and the complexity of their music just effortlessly seeped out, so the sound is a perfect blend of classic and progressive rock; nothing sounds forced, and nothing seems out of place.

As for the songs, they are all 10-star material; there is not a weak moment on the album, and it absolutely flies by when playing it. There are harder edged songs like the title track, and “Cross Eyed Mary.” There are more progressive natured songs like “My God” and “Locomotive Breath,” and then there are ballads like “Cheap Day Return,” “Wondering Aloud,” and “Slipstream.” I could easily highlight any of these, but “Aqualung (the song),” “Wondering Aloud,” and “My God” stand out above all else for me.

“Aqualung” starts out with one of the recognizable guitar riffs and lyrical openings in all of rock history. As soon as Martin Barre hits those opening sinister notes, any classic rock fan knows that it’s “Aqualung;” it is simply unmistakable. Thematically, the song is about a homeless man that is nicknamed Aqualung because of his hacking cough. Musically, the song has a biting edge to it, which is completely driven by Barre’s guitar— and on a side note, Martin Barre is one the most criminally underrated guitarists in all of rock. As mentioned, the opening notes and lyrics might be the most recognizable part of the song, but my favorite aspect of the song is its diversity, which comes in the fourth verse, when there’s a major pace change, and my favorite lyrical section of the song:

“Do you still remember/ December’s foggy freeze/ when the ice that clings on to your beard is screaming agony/ And you snatch your rattling last breaths/ with deep-sea-diver sounds/ and the flowers bloom like madness in the spring.”

Anderson’s wording here is extremely visual, and his description of the Aqualung character followed by the description of blooming flowers is a really interesting contrast, and it completely resonates with me.

In addition to the biting rockers like “Aqualung (the song),” you also have beautiful ballads like “Wondering Aloud,” which is completely moving and one of my favorite ballads of all time by any band. It depicts Anderson’s relationship with his new wife Jennie Franks, who he had married in 1970. My favorite verse is the last line, where in all candor Anderson sings…

“And it’s only the giving/ that makes you what you are.”

To me, this line is almost as powerful as the famous Beatles line at the end of “Abbey Road” that states…

“And, in the end/ the love you take/ Is equal to the love you make.”

There’s an interesting twist to this song as well: it has a sequel called “Wondering Again,” which came out a year later, so it doesn’t appear on “Aqualung.” It features very similar music, but with much darker lyrics, and the lyrics to the key verse mentioned above are changed from “And it’s only the giving/ that makes you what you are,” to “And it’s only the taking/ that makes you what you are. This could be commentary on Anderson’s view of his relationship with Franks, which was deteriorating, and they ultimately divorced in 1974. Nonetheless, “Wondering Aloud” is a completely moving love song, and if anything, its corresponding sequel is a good lesson on how short lived love can be.

The last song that I’ll highlight is “My God,” which in my view is the album’s one full-fledged progressive song (whether Ian intended it or not). Work began on “My God” before “Aqualung” was released, and they even played a very early and rough version live at the Isle of Wight Festival in 1970. Lyrically, Ian sings venomously about organized religion with lines like…

“So lean upon Him gently/ and don’t call on Him to save you/ from your social graces/ and the sins you used to waive/ The bloody Church of England/ in chains of history/ requests your earthly presence at/ the vicarage for tea.”

Musically, it is easily the most complex song on the album, and the tone of the instrumentation sounds just as poisonous as Ian’s lyrics, especially Ian’s flute playing, which culminates with a 2-minute flute solo mid-way through the song. The song is absolutely one of the many shining moments of the album, and it is certainly one of my personal favorites.

To wrap this up, it doesn’t really matter how you label “Aqualung,” but one thing is for sure, it is quintessentially Jethro Tull, which makes it completely unique. Personally, I think it is the epitome of classic and progressive rock fusion, which is why it has appealed to fans of classic rock and progressive rock for over 40-years.

Legendary Week For Me As A Music Fan!
 

This week was a legendary week for me as a music fan. I got an e-mail regarding my "Aqualung" review from Jethro Tull's management asking me to call their publicist. I thought it was BS at first, but I called anyway and they put me in touch with their publicist, who I talked to about Jethro Tull and Ian Anderson for about an hour. Being a huge JT fan, that was like getting to talk to a super hero, even if it was just the publicist.

They reached out to me to get my permission for them to post my "Aqualung" review on their Facebook page, which I obviously had no problem with.

So anyway, great day for me. She posted the link to my review on their page last night. Here's the link if anyone wants to check it out. It's the second post down on the page right now: Jethro Tull | Facebook

Very cool for me!

Grats RMR :) How cool to get noticed like that!

I believe you're more fond of Aqualung than I am, but it's definetly a classic and a very good album. My LP is hanging on the wall in our living room. :)

That's cool as hell! RMR.

It looks like we might have a "celebrity" here at MB.:)

Thanks guys. Although minor in the scheme of things... I took it as a great compliment. Certainly made my day.

RMR

I adore this album's flagrant anti-Christian themeology. Plus, it's a damn good listen, as well. I still to this day have a bit of an issue considering Tull a prog band, but that doesn't stop me at all considering this album a true gem.

Well done RMR, even before seeing this here today, I actually voted you as the best writer on Music Banter.:clap:

Man, thanks for the compliment; much appreciated!

I really need to play this album again soon.
It's so good :).

Great album. I heard this album when i was 12 and still listen to it to this day

Without doubt the most enjoyable Jethro Tull album beginning to end.

Certainly a phenomenal album, but I prefer the following year's "Thick as a Brick" and 1973's "A Passion Play."

"A Passion Play" is a tough album to penetrate, but it is fantastic, and many fans claim (including myself) that the last 15 minutes are the best music Tull ever laid down to tape.

Thick as a Brick finally grew on me a couple of years ago but Passion Play is an album I`ve always liked to trash, but Iplan on giving it another listen soon, as a number of people like yourself often sing its praises.

Also RMR how do you pick your reviews, do you just pick them yourself or do people submit albums to you?

After loving "Thick as a Brick," I was severely disappointed by "A Passion Play" (at first). However, I bought it a time when I was pretty much broke, so I didn't have the money to buy another new album to move on to. So I just kept it playing in my car on repeat for weeks and finally bits and pieces really started to expose themselves. Then, the whole thing just finally sunk in all at once, and I was completely blown away (more so than I have ever been by any other album). From there, I really got into the lyrical meaning, and there are loads of interpretations online. All in all, there is a tremendous amount of complex instrumentation and lyrical depth in it, and for those who put in the time, it will absolutely be one of their most rewarding listening experiences. I wouldn't call it my favorite album of all time, but if I had only one album to take to a desert island… that would absolutely be it. I've listened to it hundreds of times, and I still here new parts every time I listen to it. People are obsessed with the album. Here's one site that is completely dedicated to the album. They go as far as explaining every line. It's pretty interesting: Jethro Tull's album 'A Passion Play' annotated at the Ministry Of Information

----------------------

In terms of my reviews, I don't have any exact system of how I pick the albums. My original goal was just to review all of Rush's albums, but I realized that I really liked the album review process, so I started expanding from there. My goals right now are to finish Rush, which I'm getting close to doing, and to get all the bands that are really important to me up on my site. Additionally, I am always working on two album reviews at once: one album I already know, and one new album. That way I will eventually finish reviewing the discographies of the bands that I already own and love, but not at the expense of halting my exploration for new albums and music.

At this point, I get requests from people and emerging bands almost every day to review certain albums (from Facebook, twitter, and my site), but for the most part, I just review what I want. I really want to keep it fun and just a hobby, and I find that if I try to schedule or regiment my reviews to much, the process loses its fun, which is the only reason I do it.

You`ve certainly wetted my appetite for Passion Play now and I reckon I`ll push it up my listening list.

I`ve been on this site since 2009 and despite starting threads and doing light reviews etc, I`ve never done a proper in depth review, I`ll probably do something now after Christmas when I`ve got more time, as there are a whole load of albums I`d love to review.