Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2041434)

I don't think it's even possible to have a moderation team that doesn't have some sort of bias and that we should just deal with it.

Originally Posted by windsock (Post 2041432)

Don't be so hard on yourself.

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2041437)

Good, I'm glad this thread is finished.

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2041434)

The point I made is that there was a clear bias against merit because every time it appeared there WERE mods here to moderate. They didn't until MERIT started getting out of hand while letting personal attacks that crossed what ever line was drawn against him go by. I know this because I have made personal attacks towards Merit that crossed the line and never got a warning for it.

I didn't say I have a problem with it or that it needs to be changed, but the only complaints anybody has on here is with that clear undeniable bias. Not with the forum needing stricter moderation.

I'm just pointing that out to say it DOES exist. Like I already said though, I don't think it's even possible to have a moderation team that doesn't have some sort of bias and that we should just deal with it.

Originally Posted by Dharma & Greg (Post 2041440)

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2041441)

Only until Merit comes back 6 months later to try and campaign again.

Originally Posted by Exo (Post 2041444)

You need to work on conveying intent then because It really seemed like you were saying we're not doing our jobs right.

Originally Posted by Exo (Post 2041444)

"I know this because I have made personal attacks towards Merit that crossed the line and never got a warning for it."

INFRACTION!

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2041452)

Don't jump to conclusions. Perhaps then you could do your job right.

Originally Posted by Unitron (Post 2041446)

bee*