Classic does not = Baroque/Romantic? (alternative, rock, genre, Nirvana) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > Classical
Classic does not = Baroque/Romantic? Classic does not = Baroque/Romantic? (alternative, rock, genre, Nirvana)
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2008, 05:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Groupie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Default
I see somebody wishes to show off their newly-gained knowledge of classical music.

Anything before the 1900s can be considered classical; be that Medieval, Baroque, Renainssance, Romantic or the true Classical music - it's all classical nonetheless.
Anonymouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Similar Threads


Terms & Privacy - Contact Us - Music Banter - Archive - Top

© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.