Erm, ok, sorry guys, can I ask, why is this asshole still a member? As far as I can tell, all he does is get into confrontation with other members. A bit of a waste of everyone's time no?

1. There are talks.
2. Stop calling people names like asshole.

Never happened to Pablo Picasso

I want to see how Frown defends Chula.

As per widespread forum discussion in the last few years members vocalized a desire for an anything-goes-within-reason environment, citing established members enjoying good fun ****-talking. There were those who opposed, saying in order to entice new members to stay there needed to be some sense of structure and The Rules must be consistently applied to everyone, and the kind of ****-talking going on was simply not a good look for the forum. Those people were told that they were the minority and if they didnt like it here they could leave, so a handful of members left and MB continued to mature into the paradise of comedy you see now. Every ban was scrutinized and members expected to be a part of the decision making process in terms of discipline. I dont know of anyone except JWB that has been permabanned since. So in other words, the people spoke and the mods (at the time) listened, and now we get to deal with Chula's monthlies.

https://media.giphy.com/media/un1u5EN4iCGaY/giphy.gif

Also, what Steph said.

I see. So I guess the threshold for a ban would be...posting a link to your website, but not threatening to murder people.

Cool, seems reasonable.

Might I inquire why cassavetes was banned, given these kinds of standards? Triple post?