No boobalicious I was pointing out that we cant shoot someone 16 hours after a sentance ala the arabs removing limbs...not due process

Best headline ever...

http://i1058.photobucket.com/albums/...ps8i80or4q.jpg

Source? I don't think they've ever won one. The New York Times on the other hand.

They were well respected in the 19th century but then went downhill. Since Murdoch bought them in 1976 the paper has become a total joke.

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.mandatory...ama-weiner.jpg

I was refering to the Enquirer , pulitzer-winning magazine.
Albeit a rag but they break stories long before mainstream media gets a hold of it the winning them multiple Pulitzer. The magazine racks at the grocery store, people, time, Esquire cooking bags all rent that rack from The National Enquirer.

They were considered for one for breaking the Edwards affair story but didn't win. Where you getting multiple wins from???

Keep looking.

Not finding anything except for the fact that they pay for story leads which is why they break some big stories first. And they weren't nominated afterall. They were "being considered".

The PP committee caught a ton of flack over that since paying for stories is not considered legit.

Funny quote: Nominating the Enquirer for a PP is like nominating a porn movie for an Oscar.
:D

Conspiracy theroist^

The porn industry deserves more respect, if you ask me.