^ Well, yes, it's a poll, Frownland - it's not an invitation to write an essay - or attend a town hall meeting. In fact we have polls on MB too; do people boycott those because they "dictate what you are allowed to say"?


I'd have to be better informed to take issue with this. That's not likely to happen, so I'll concede this point.


Yeah, that's a good analogy, and makes very clear your point about both options being bad. May I make two points:-

i) your choices suggests a victim and a torturer, in which the person offering the vote is willfully inflicting the torture. Perhaps a better analogy for America would be a choice between two disagreeable medical treatments. There's a problem which needs to be addressed and the doctors give you a choice: you've got cancer - do you want amputation or chemotherapy?

ii) even in your bleak analogy, it only takes two votes to work out the lesser of the two evils, and I'm pretty sure I'd would vote for that each time thereafter.

Pueblo Indians did it for two hundred years

^ Steady, please Frownland! Chula called the policy of not voting third party intelligent, not himself. If you carry on like this, Janzsoon will be locking the thread on us!

^ Yes, because so many of us live in small isolated and inaccesible communities.

The patient isn't sick. One doctor has herpes and the other HIV. You're told if you don't choose one of them to **** you in the ass you're doing nothing.

All of humanity did it before Mesopotamia.

I.e. perpetuating evil that you are not free from. This is why I consider voting as a form of liberty to be a farce.

I'll post some lyrics because I'm cheesy.

So, a week later, are you cucks STILL eating the official narrative of the las vegas attack?

You should wait before the investigation is over so that there is a legitimate official story before you denounce the official story. It makes you look less like a denialist if you allow someone to finish their sentence before you go "nuh uh!"

What is it with internet weirdos and the word cucks?