Wow this post is classic.

And we just need to continue what we're doing. At some point there has to be some sort of revolt, the living conditions there are absolute hell. If countries around the world weren't shipping food, etc, then it would have already fallen through. Though the one worry is if Kim Jong-Il gets desperate and starts doing crazy ****.

I think this is one issue where the American way of things pisses me off. I know we said we'd never interfere in the governments of other countries, but I feel as if they should just ship in the snipers.

The man is no good for anyone.

When was this said and when has the U.S. ever followed this policy? :confused:

its the idea behind our republic. it was the reason we stayed out of WWII for so long.

To be honest, we could have interceded far more often, in far more governments than we actually do.

Naah! What's to hate?

http://images.virtualology.com/images/5225.jpg

Definitely, we prefer the Iraqs over the Darfurs.

The amount of people in this thread that seem to believe North Korea is in the middle east is scary.

As for Darfur, it is likely the region will always be a cluster****.

But Afghanistan! Oh man that area is just waiting to be democratically and turn into a free country. And it's really only Darkest Hour that thinks its in the middle east. I was posting on little sleep and up late and forgot what thread I was in. Besides if we removed China I'd be right.

Bin Laden and Al Queda = direct threat to the US
Leaders in Sudan = not a direct threat to the US

That wasn't all that hard of an equation.

Um that's not really what I was talking about at all. It was more an attack on people like the US President (both Bush and Obama) who ignore the socioeconomic/religious fundamentalism of the area and get all pissy when Karzai agrees to legalize the abuse of women.