|
Register | Blogging | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-02-2010, 12:28 PM | #11 (permalink) |
thirsty ears
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Boulder
Posts: 742
|
regarding the image i posted - judging by the rest of the imagery in that tradition, and the sorts of places in which the art was produced, it is very probable that the cultural group responsible for the images were shamanistic.
shamans were (are) spiritual leaders who make use of altered states of consciousness to establish and maintain contact with the spirit world. altered states are biochemical phenomena, and the sorts of visual and somatic hallucinations they produce are often quite predictable. in this image, we see floating human-like figures which is likely related to the sensation of an out-of-body experience, or of flying. the large eyes could indicate expanded visual powers. the flying objects around them may be what are called entropic phenomena - basically, the weird spots and shapes you see when you're on drugs. even the elongation of the figures is a well-documented somatic hallucination referred to as 'attenuation'. the snakes and birds are common in this tradition - they probably had metaphorical significance. it's hard to 'interpret' ancient art in this way, since it really consists of layer upon layer of metaphor, most of which we no longer have access to. there are clues to help us interpret, but in a sense you're right, it's all a giant guessing game
__________________
my flac collection |
06-02-2010, 03:04 PM | #12 (permalink) |
MB quadrant's JM Vincent
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 3,762
|
Tore, I'm with you on the parsimony, especially being a biologist myself. However, I don't like to be trapped by it. I use it appropriately when thinking about designing a very specific experiment, but I have a firm belief that sometimes wild leaps need to be made to make real discoveries. Being very parsimonious gets you the tiny details, like which protein out of millions of proteins belong to which intracellular compartment, but that is about as far as it goes. For example, when Fleming discovered penicillin, he did so knowing full well most of the scientists in the world thought he was nuts.
Basically I guess I'm saying stay logical, but keep an open mind. It is one thing to believe the hypothesis with the least assumptions and another to flat out deny the other possibilities. When that happens, it is harder recognize evidence that proves the wilder theory even if it shows up. At this point, I like to give our ancient ancestors credit for their accomplishments. They built the pyramids. They were bored and came up with fantasy creatures and stories to go with them. But who knows, maybe it was all aliens...
__________________
Confusion will be my epitaph... |
06-06-2010, 05:57 AM | #15 (permalink) |
DO LIKE YOU.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 629
|
i think the unimaginable vastness of the universe is enough to convince me that if i were to assume there were no technologically advanced species farther along than us, i would be quite ahead of myself and parsimony is dust to the wind. the drake equation is very vague, but only so much as our understanding of our non-local environment is though, and i strongly believe this should be more often considered.
and then there is Paul Hellyer. he is the former Canadian Defense Minister, and was Deputy Prime Minister under Pierre Elliot Trudeau. he's not some quack, and he, along with his current associates (and well over 4,000,000 reported interactions in one form or another since 1957) REALLY believe in aliens. they call the interactions between our race and the many that visit Earth "Exopolitics" and are moving in an effort to psychologically prepare humanity for the eventuality of our integration into a Universe Society. interesting sh*t. Last edited by P A N; 06-06-2010 at 06:13 AM. Reason: g(r)amma |
06-06-2010, 08:38 AM | #16 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
__________________
No more stories / are told today / I'm sorry / they washed away // No more stories / the world is grey / I'm tired / let's wash away.
|
|
06-06-2010, 09:04 AM | #17 (permalink) | |
DO LIKE YOU.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 629
|
Quote:
WHY does the vastness of our universe make it extremely unlikely that any alien race would have come in contact with us? you just rearranged my words and muttered "nah." |
|
06-06-2010, 09:48 AM | #18 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
Now all of that depends on the frequency of life, which we do not have a clue about. If life is very frequent (i.e. life in every other solar system) then yes, it is likely we have been or will be visited by aliens. If it is very infrequent (i.e. a few in every galaxy) then it is unlikely. What I'm saying is that the vastness of the universe means that the frequency of life becomes the biggest factor is our likeliness to have been visited, and we don't know that. Also, I'm not saying it is a good argument, just saying that it is sometimes used as a point against this theory.
__________________
No more stories / are told today / I'm sorry / they washed away // No more stories / the world is grey / I'm tired / let's wash away.
|
|
06-06-2010, 11:39 AM | #19 (permalink) |
DO LIKE YOU.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 629
|
"during human existence" is not an accurate measure at all.
earth is young. that doesn't mean the rest of the planets in the universe are. the idea of space travel should also not be limited to the idea of limited means. it's likely that with an understanding of physics millions of times greater than our own (relative to our difference in age as a species), these civilizations don't have to deal with overcoming the problems we humans face as the pilots of jet-propelled craft. then you need to consider the size of a UNIVERSE SOCIETY. i don't know exactly how long humans have been around. but i wouldn't call the notion impossible that a species, or very large group of different species co-mingling, could be millions of times older than humans. thus creating a possible population of numbers and vastness unimaginable. perhaps there are more of them than there are stars in the sky... perhaps enabling them, if they did not create all the planets in the universe themselves, that is, to keep tabs on all life-bearing planets. and who knows, perhaps we're under an intergalactic quarantine, effectively disabling our evolutionary path... cuz we do SO MUCH STUPID SH*T. |
06-06-2010, 11:53 AM | #20 (permalink) | |
Music Addict
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 120
|
Quote:
__________________
No more stories / are told today / I'm sorry / they washed away // No more stories / the world is grey / I'm tired / let's wash away.
|
|
|