Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   This is one of the most retarded articles I think I've ever read (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/51333-one-most-retarded-articles-i-think-ive-ever-read.html)

stormjh 09-03-2010 06:42 AM

This is one of the most retarded articles I think I've ever read
 
Sluts and sweethearts | Life and style | The Guardian

Quote:

I'd like to add some words to the Pyramid myself. There's humourless, paranoid, selfish, prudish, unable to take a joke, hysterical, man-hating, aggressive, butch: these words essentially just mean "shut up, woman".
Is she for real? How are any of them sexist?

Odyshape 09-03-2010 07:23 AM

Didn't know people like this existed in real life that weren't under the age of 17.

timptimp 09-03-2010 06:05 PM

i hate her face.

Nine Black Poppies 09-03-2010 06:38 PM

Reading the comments on that was actually more interesting than the article itself.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Odyshape (Post 926225)
Didn't know people like this existed in real life that weren't under the age of 17.

What's sad is there are tons of people who see life through a lens like this (hers happens to be psuedo-feminism, but it's the same principle for other things too).

It's frustrating though, because I do see a point buried in the hysteria and crap like this makes it harder to discuss that point intelligently and still be taken seriously.

It does speak to the interesting nature of language, though. What she doesn't take into account is how words are abstracts, without inherent meaning. Language changes and evolves because of how words are interpreted--the power of a word is in the response it evokes, not necessarily the intended meaning.

Kind of the old "bullies on the playground" strategem--don't get upset and the power dynamic starts to change. Misuse hyperbole and you just reenforce the problem.

boo boo 09-11-2010 02:23 AM

And this is why women shouldn't be allowed to write articles. It sends the dangerous message that they are capable of rational thought.

TheCunningStunt 09-11-2010 02:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 930149)
And this is why women shouldn't be allowed to write articles. It sends the dangerous message that they are capable of rational thought.

http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/d...hocksmilie.png

You've changed.

http://i226.photobucket.com/albums/d.../hurr_hurr.png

boo boo 09-11-2010 02:26 AM

I just want to be popular. :(

boo boo 09-11-2010 02:29 AM

But what I really would like to say is, sites like the Guardian seem to always pick total idiots as their token female contributor and when they make rants like these it's a total kick in the balls (or should I say ovaries?) to feminism.

I don't like to call myself a feminist just out of guilt by association with all the idiots who call themselves feminists. It's really sad how people can take a concept as simple as equal rights for people of both sexes and twist it around to mean all kinds of ridiculous bullsh*t.

right-track 09-11-2010 02:34 AM

Welcome back boo.

A very wise woman once said:

Nothing.

Barnard17 09-11-2010 06:37 AM

People need to realise it's not the words you use it's the way you use them. Generally, "sweetie" is used in an endearing way yet apparently it's a sign of depraved chauvinism. This woman should be labelled a feminazi, because she's gone overboard and nutzo and declares swathes and swathes of people misogynistic based purely upon the words they use and not the mentality or intent with which they're used.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.