democracy
do you believe in it?
is the best form of government one that draws its power from the people? what if the people are clueless when it comes to the complex questions of how to run a country, shore up geopolitical interest and maintain a healthy economy. people don't have the time of day to run a country... so what makes the public uniquely qualified to pick out the people that do? |
The people in general are certainly incompetent and I wouldn't trust them with my goldfish. They elect idiots and crooks, let themselves get fooled into believing that they've done otherwise, all the while knowing the truth somehow. It'd be a perfect story for Kurt Vonnegut. The only thing that makes democracy desirable is that rule is divided amongst so many people that tyranny is far less likely. Sure we have power-hungry politicians, but the fact that they have to pander to us means that they at least have to stay within the bounds of sanity to stay in power (evangelicals not withstanding). Democracy blows, but it's better than any other alternative.
|
I believe in direct, Jacksonian democracy – in such a system an informed voter is important, and yes in some countries there's apathy and ignorance about some issues, but when people have direct control over their government it fosters a spirit of education and people generally become more informed. No decision making on the part of elected officials, just pure uninhibited democracy and lots of campaigning and political activism from the people themselves.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, not saying I support this idea, but it's interesting as a thought experiment at least. Democracy and "the will of the people" are kind of a fetish in the modern Western world, and no matter their merit, people often support the whole philosophy simply because... well, it's democracy, man. It's... you know, like, the thing. The only moral system of government... or whatever. Most people don't even consider for a moment that something less "We the people"-y might actually work better. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Batlord's idea deserves consideration, at least. After all, democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others previously tried, and should be considered such.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It goes beyond politics. The real wealthy members of this society that have the "old" money have their hands in a lot more than elections. I agree it doesn't exactly fit the traditional definition of a caste system but I think it mirrors it closely enough to accuse it of being one.
Economy, media, war... it's all controlled to benefit "them". |
I am for democracy.
Because we are given the rights to say what we like to say even if some of us not enjoy it. Democracy allows healthy debates for the souls and minds of the people. If we have no debates then how it can move forward or let alone be a credible country. At least in America, we are stilled allowed debates. |
there's not a caste system in the US because the classes are not quite as rigid... but beyond that we have a virtual plutocracy where money and power breeds even more money and power.
i have toyed with an idea similar to batlord's except without the birthright. civil servants would be appointed based on merit and credentials much like scientists and researchers are. if they do a poor job then they are fired. |
Quote:
+ Capitalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia = Plutonomy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia But it's hard to determine whether we should blame Democracy or just bad policy and human nature. Democracy correlates with more civility for most cultures. I think the US has tried to force feed Democracy on cultures that are still pretty feudal and it hasn't worked out for us. So maybe it's not so much that Democracy is fundamentally flawed as much as human nature isn't ready for something like that. |
Quote:
Quote:
let's be honest.. how can we expect any other result when we combine capitalism with democracy? democracy makes a man's opinion valuable and capitalism makes a man's opinion buyable. this is exactly what you should expect. i'm not sure if obama is being disingenuous or naive when he says "that's not the way things are supposed to work." |
Quote:
http://www.musicbanter.com/games-lis...votes-com.html |
i know you weren't being serious but that business would be brilliant if only there was a way to check up on who voted for who to make sure you got your money's worth. cause if someone paid me 100 dollars to vote for them i would just take the money and not vote anyway since they'd never know the difference.
|
I don't think they would just give the money up front.
You'd have to show proof that you voted for the person in order to get the money. |
I'd take the money and vote too, just for the lulz.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.