Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Current Events, Philosophy, & Religion (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/)
-   -   Is there life on Mars? (https://www.musicbanter.com/current-events-philosophy-religion/82911-there-life-mars.html)

grindy 07-20-2015 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1617255)
You would have to think that considering how much space there is, how many galaxies, how many (maybe) universes (Ki) that the chances of there not being life on at least some of those planets is pretty small. I mean, it may not be what we would understand or recognise as humanoid life, but you'd have to think there'd be life there. As for all these supposed abductees, well, they can't all be wrong, can they?
This film does a great job of showing us just how alien that life, should it exist, might be. Love this.

I hope you're joking.

William_the_Bloody 07-21-2015 12:58 AM

Is there life on Mars? There is now....well potentially

Mars Curiosity rover may have transported Earth bacteria to Mars

Trollheart 07-26-2015 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grindy (Post 1617513)
I hope you're joking.

Why?

The Batlord 07-26-2015 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1619134)
Why?

You believe in alien abductions?

John Wilkes Booth 07-26-2015 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1619134)
Why?

because they can all be wrong.

Guybrush 07-26-2015 04:18 PM

I believe there's lots of life out there and a very rare bit of it will be what we roughly think of as intelligent.

Similar conditions and processes that gave rise to life on earth could happen elsewhere on a multitude of worlds - and likely have. Even extra terrestrial life elsewhere in our own solar system seems like a reasonable possibility to me, for example on Europa. We have vent ecosystems on planet earth that get their energy from heat and chemicals vented from our planet rather than the sun. Similar ecosystems could exist under the surface of otherwise inhospitable worlds.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1617252)
We've seen a LOT of planets out there and only one has contained life (Earth).

We haven't seen a lot of planets. We've detected a lot of planets. Generally, they are detected by watching stars. When a planet passes between our telescope and the star we are looking at, there is a change in the luminosity of that star. The bigger the planet, the bigger the change. Hence, this method is best for finding really big planets and not small, rocky, earth-like ones. And when a planet is detected this way, it doesn't mean we've gotten a look at it and could possibly see if it contains trees or cities.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1617252)
Certainly our own existence is proof that its possible, but it's also an improbable event.

Winning the lottery is an improbable event, but there are still plenty of lottery winners. Even if the lottery was a million times harder to win, there would still be winners - even if they'd be a few years apart.

Life elsewhere in the universe has a lot of chances.

Imagine that we are the product of one lineage of life that stretches back all the way to some origin of life (if hard to pinpoint). If that origin hadn't happened or life had completely died out some millions of years later, we wouldn't have been here. But maybe life would have redeveloped in a new lineage or maybe the 30th attempt would have been the successful one. This planet could have animals on it or be inhabited only by unicellular organisms or whatever. It might not be humans, but it would likely be something.

I think a likely problem with intelligent life is that it probably tends to eradicate itself by using up and destroying resources and then crashing. Maybe intelligent civilizations only tend to last a short while.

Trollheart 07-26-2015 04:44 PM

If you believe in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, then why could they not have visited this planet? I'm not a UFO nut, I don't necessarily believe abductions happen, but I'm not arrogant enough to state they categorically did not. They could have, is what I'm saying. And a lot of the stories abductees tell are remarkably similar. Didn't any of you watch The X-Files?

Is it more stupid to believe in the possibility of life on other worlds (which then allows they may have visited ours) than to put your faith in a concept with no empirical evidence to back it up at all, to believe in a god? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with believing in God or a god, but it's just as much a leap of faith as allowing the chance that some --- probably not all, or even that many, but some --- of these abductees may in fact be recalling actual experiences. I don't know for sure they did, but by the same token you don't know for sure that they didn't, so you have to be open to the possibility.
http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/a...80_521018a.jpg
"You know what, Vort The Invincible? Sometimes I look up at the sky and I wonder ... could there be other intelligent life out there?"

Guybrush 07-26-2015 05:04 PM

I believe in life on other planets, but I don't think we've been visited by representatives of other intelligent civilizations. The greatest barriers are space and time and these barriers are generally enormous. Aliens would probably have to cross oceans of time and space to travel from their planet of origin to ours and I just generally believe that it's too big an obstacle. Even if it's not impossible, it is likely to be impractical and so if there are civilizations that colonize space, it doesn't necessarily mean they would travel very far in cosmological terms. If it takes you 50 000 years to get to one planet and 500 years to get to another, the choice seems simple. Still, colonizing space would make a civilization more resistant to dying out and they could radiate out over time, but still ..

There's also a lack of evidence that we've ever been visited. I imagine the only real point of visiting our planet would be because it holds some resource they could use, even if it was just something simple like decent gravity, water and a good temperature. When we look to other planets, we think of whether it's a place we could colonize or perhaps harvest something from .. I assume intelligent aliens would have the same practical sensibilities.

If intelligent aliens had visited earth in the past, for example when the dinosaurs were around, I would think they'd build a colony - perhaps bring some alien organisms for agriculture or whatever. There'd be some indication they were here, like a very different lineage of organisms that suddenly seemed to appear in evolutionary history or perhaps even ruins of an ancient civilization.

Xurtio 07-26-2015 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tore (Post 1619203)
I believe there's lots of life out there and a very rare bit of it will be what we roughly think of as intelligent.

Similar conditions and processes that gave rise to life on earth could happen elsewhere on a multitude of worlds - and likely have. Even extra terrestrial life elsewhere in our own solar system seems like a reasonable possibility to me, for example on Europa. We have vent ecosystems on planet earth that get their energy from heat and chemicals vented from our planet rather than the sun. Similar ecosystems could exist under the surface of otherwise inhospitable worlds.



We haven't seen a lot of planets. We've detected a lot of planets. Generally, they are detected by watching stars. When a planet passes between our telescope and the star we are looking at, there is a change in the luminosity of that star. The bigger the planet, the bigger the change. Hence, this method is best for finding really big planets and not small, rocky, earth-like ones. And when a planet is detected this way, it doesn't mean we've gotten a look at it and could possibly see if it contains trees or cities.



Winning the lottery is an improbable event, but there are still plenty of lottery winners. Even if the lottery was a million times harder to win, there would still be winners - even if they'd be a few years apart.

Life elsewhere in the universe has a lot of chances.

Imagine that we are the product of one lineage of life that stretches back all the way to some origin of life (if hard to pinpoint). If that origin hadn't happened or life had completely died out some millions of years later, we wouldn't have been here. But maybe life would have redeveloped in a new lineage or maybe the 30th attempt would have been the successful one. This planet could have animals on it or be inhabited only by unicellular organisms or whatever. It might not be humans, but it would likely be something.

I think a likely problem with intelligent life is that it probably tends to eradicate itself by using up and destroying resources and then crashing. Maybe intelligent civilizations only tend to last a short while.

Since the 1980's, the way planets are detected is through doppler spectroscopy. High-dispersion spectroscopy is what they are starting to use to detect whether planets have a chemical composition complex enough to support life or not.

Either way, I won't get my hopes up until there's solid evidence.

Guybrush 07-27-2015 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1619246)
Since the 1980's, the way planets are detected is through doppler spectroscopy. High-dispersion spectroscopy is what they are starting to use to detect whether planets have a chemical composition complex enough to support life or not.

Either way, I won't get my hopes up until there's solid evidence.

This is basically what I mentioned, but knowing a planet's chemical composition generally does not tell us if there's life on it. And also as I mentioned, the greater the mass of a planet, the easier it is to detect this way and so as a method, it favours detection of big planets which tend to be inhospitable gas giants.

Cuthbert 07-27-2015 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladyislingering (Post 1617031)
..or any other place within the galaxy outside of earth?

This is an absolute certainty, all things considered.

All you'd need to do was find something like yeast on another planet.

I think they've found evidence of underground water on Mars now.

@Chula do your thing mate.

Trollheart 07-27-2015 05:34 AM

Given the vastness of our own galaxy, only one in a massive number of galaxies in our own local group, and that only a tiny portion of the universe, and given how long the universe is accepted to have existed, I think technologies could exist out there that we have no conception of, and so literally anything could be possible.

Frownland 07-27-2015 08:04 AM

Very informative tore, thanks for posting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trollheart (Post 1619210)
If you believe in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, then why could they not have visited this planet? I'm not a UFO nut, I don't necessarily believe abductions happen, but I'm not arrogant enough to state they categorically did not. They could have, is what I'm saying. And a lot of the stories abductees tell are remarkably similar. Didn't any of you watch The X-Files?

Is it more stupid to believe in the possibility of life on other worlds (which then allows they may have visited ours) than to put your faith in a concept with no empirical evidence to back it up at all, to believe in a god? I'm not saying there's anything wrong with believing in God or a god, but it's just as much a leap of faith as allowing the chance that some --- probably not all, or even that many, but some --- of these abductees may in fact be recalling actual experiences. I don't know for sure they did, but by the same token you don't know for sure that they didn't, so you have to be open to the possibility.
http://img.thesun.co.uk/aidemitlum/a...80_521018a.jpg
"You know what, Vort The Invincible? Sometimes I look up at the sky and I wonder ... could there be other intelligent life out there?"

Overwhelming lack of evidence from abductees and the whole paranoid and very recent culture revolving around allegedly alien UFOs is enough for me to call horse**** on the 'abductees'. Of course it's not impossible that aliens visited us but I highly doubt it. I'm not religious either because of the same lack of evidence.

Xurtio 07-27-2015 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tore (Post 1619314)
This is basically what I mentioned, but knowing a planet's chemical composition generally does not tell us if there's life on it. And also as I mentioned, the greater the mass of a planet, the easier it is to detect this way and so as a method, it favours detection of big planets which tend to be inhospitable gas giants.


It's a ROC curve - and a ROC curve that favors false positives since there's no danger in false negatives. If your planet is made entirely of only five or six elements, or has no key elements like oxygen or carbon, the chances of life having formed there are approaching 0.

Edit: also your point that it doesn't tell you if life is there is a good one too. Even if carbon and oxygen are there, there's no guarantee that life is there. Of course, this is all in the drake equation.

Trollheart 07-27-2015 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619375)
Very informative tore, thanks for posting.



Overwhelming lack of evidence from abductees and the whole paranoid and very recent culture revolving around allegedly alien UFOs is enough for me to call horse**** on the 'abductees'. Of course it's not impossible that aliens visited us but I highly doubt it. I'm not religious either because of the same lack of evidence.

Yeah I'm not a believer like I said, but just open to the possibility. Maybe aliens stole my three grand this morning? :mad:

And of course you knew this was coming...
http://s.likes-media.com/img/9e47684...a0296.600x.jpg

Frownland 07-27-2015 12:26 PM

I'm open to the possibility as well, but anything supporting that possibility is not present, so saying all those abductees can't be wrong...makes it sound like you've accepted the possibility even though the only evidence is anecdotal.

Trollheart 07-27-2015 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619475)
I'm open to the possibility as well, but anything supporting that possibility is not present, so saying all those abductees can't be wrong...makes it sound like you've accepted the possibility even though the only evidence is anecdotal.

I didn't mean they're all right, I meant some of them may be. Probably badly phrased I'll grant you. Was mostly in jest anyway but I don't like to assume I know everything (even though I do) and so always allow for the possibility that there may be some grain of truth in it. Maybe.

Pretty sure they were the ones stole my money though. I mean, I've never even been to Galactic Supply Station K-21, never mind bought a sixpack of triple strength Neptunian brandy...

Mr. Charlie 07-27-2015 01:56 PM

I like newts.

Xurtio 07-27-2015 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie (Post 1619532)
I like newts.

Jesus was schizophrenic

Mr. Charlie 07-27-2015 03:28 PM

Jesus is dead. Where as I saw a living newt today.

Pet_Sounds 07-27-2015 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie (Post 1619575)
Jesus is dead. Where as I saw a living newt today.

Evidently the lizard king.

Mr. Charlie 07-27-2015 04:16 PM

So we agree newts are better than dead prophets. Good.

The Batlord 07-27-2015 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie (Post 1619603)
So we agree newts are better than dead prophets. Good.

And lame Doors references as well.

Guybrush 07-27-2015 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xurtio (Post 1619377)
It's a ROC curve - and a ROC curve that favors false positives since there's no danger in false negatives. If your planet is made entirely of only five or six elements, or has no key elements like oxygen or carbon, the chances of life having formed there are approaching 0.

Edit: also your point that it doesn't tell you if life is there is a good one too. Even if carbon and oxygen are there, there's no guarantee that life is there. Of course, this is all in the drake equation.

I guess I consider myself pragmatic in that I believe life elsewhere would be similar to life on earth, but some are a little more creative. Stephen Hawking for example has suggested life elsewhere could be so alien to us, we'd never know what to look for. His example was the possibility of life forms living within stars.

That seems very far fetched to me, but who knows?

edit :

Regarding abductees, I heard a radio program some years ago in which some professor was talking about mental illnesses and delusions through the ages. Very roughly speaking, he made a point and convincing argument that back in the real good days, delusions used to be religious with people seeing angels or demons and the like until some time after the age of enlightenment where some would think they were abducted and experimented on by scientsts, much like some people believe they've been abducted by UFO's today. The general idea was that these people are just a little nuts and their delusions basically reflect the times.

Mr. Charlie 07-27-2015 04:27 PM

It's not far fetched if you think about it. Life wasn't put on Earth, it didn't come into this world, it came out of this world. We're suited to our environment because we were created from the environment. Who's to say lifeforms from and in different environments can't exist without water, oxygen, and other things we deem necessary? Man is not the measure of all things. Man is the measure of man.

ladyislingering 07-27-2015 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pet_Sounds (Post 1619598)
Evidently the lizard king.

Jim Morrison is a newt?

Mr. Charlie 07-27-2015 04:37 PM

Like Jesus, Jim's dead.

Frownland 07-27-2015 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Charlie (Post 1619609)
It's not far fetched if you think about it. Life wasn't put on Earth, it didn't come into this world, it came out of this world. We're suited to our environment because we were created from the environment. Who's to say lifeforms from and in different environments can't exist without water, oxygen, and other things we deem necessary? Man is not the measure of all things. Man is the measure of man.

While I agree that the first life forms here came about as a cause of organic chemistry, there have been meteorites that have had bacteria on them. It's still a possibility that the earliest life forms could have come from space, making us the alien visitors. Also, we ready have a lot of anaerobic organisms who don't need water here on earth too so that's definitely possible too.

As far as tore's point about us not being able to recognize alien life, I'm kind of with Hawking on this one. There's no real way to validate either side, but I think the adaptability of life on earth suggests that life forms could adapt to be something like what he describes. Really hard to know for sure, but some of the life on earth is kind of far fetched sounding too.

ladyislingering 07-27-2015 04:45 PM

What's the difference between Jesus and Jim Morrison?

Nothing, really. I'd probably just nail one and fuck the other.

Frownland 07-27-2015 04:51 PM

Jim Morrisson doesn't exist? News to me.

Pet_Sounds 07-27-2015 04:54 PM

It's actually Jim Van Morrissey.

Trollheart 07-27-2015 05:03 PM

http://www.away-mission.com/media/ca.../cbs1157_5.jpg

ladyislingering 07-27-2015 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619625)
Jim Morrisson doesn't exist? News to me.

i'm drunkposting, sorry

logic fails me at this time

Frownland 07-27-2015 05:09 PM

Whenever you talk about ****ing someone I just kind of jump to that conclusion.

ladyislingering 07-27-2015 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619634)
Whenever you talk about ****ing someone I just kind of jump to that conclusion.

you already know me a little bit better than most people :laughing:

The Batlord 07-27-2015 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 1619634)
Whenever you talk about ****ing someone I just kind of jump to that conclusion.

Cause when she's sober she sure as hell wouldn't **** anyone. Of course she might just be coming up with excuses, and all the dudes she meets are actually just repelled by her grandma glasses.

RoxyRollah 07-27-2015 06:17 PM

Bit harsh no?

ladyislingering 07-27-2015 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1619645)
Cause when she's sober she sure as hell wouldn't **** anyone. Of course she might just be coming up with excuses, and all the dudes she meets are actually just repelled by her grandma glasses.

I never said anything about fancying men in particular.

Unless they happen to be Jim Morrison.

Or my boyfriend.

But I've met plenty of pretty girls that just have the softest faces suitable for kissing.

Xurtio 07-27-2015 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tore (Post 1619607)
I guess I consider myself pragmatic in that I believe life elsewhere would be similar to life on earth, but some are a little more creative. Stephen Hawking for example has suggested life elsewhere could be so alien to us, we'd never know what to look for. His example was the possibility of life forms living within stars.

That seems very far fetched to me, but who knows?

Hawking has gotten quite speculative in his old age. It's kind of annoying because the public sees him as the ultimate scientific authority, the Einstein of today. Even Einstein had some crazy scientific obsessions near the end of his life.

The Batlord 07-27-2015 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RoxyRollah (Post 1619646)
Bit harsh no?

Have you seen her glasses? That's not seventies. That's straight fifties, man.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.