![]() |
.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Chula you asked a question that I am incapable of answering you. But you know that you loaded the question so that it reinforces your beliefs that hes not there. Thats your prerogative.
|
.
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Wait ok so Im protestant... Am I wrong in thinking there was a pope between John Paul II and Benedict the Nazi.like didnt one quit....only one in 600 years am I crazier than normal.
|
.
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
.
|
Quote:
Shout Amen! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual...cese_of_Boston And a few other whoppers. You can put lipstick on a pig...... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathol...al_abuse_cases https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_...ses_by_country And these people's actions do in fact invalidate the Magisterium. As does The Crusades and The Spanish Inquisition. To say no, and to ignore this sure reeks of being brainwashed, or at the very least having complete and utter blind faith that's devoid of any logic or reason. |
.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Again, actions don't happen in a vacuum. Considering that these types of things occured far more often in the church than in the rest of life, and considering that people in high up positions would have had to cover abuse up, I think it's safe to say that there's some particular factor within the church to blame. At what point would you think that corruption had occured? Does the Pope himself have to know about it in order for there to be a problem? |
.
|
.
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:36 AM. |
© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.