we can do a "hard" reset

if
you
know
what
i
mean

You don't know what you're asking for, son.

ask now, regret later.

she won

What is supposed to be done about fake news? Censorship? Monopolization?

Education and a sense of responsibility from Facebook would be a start.

.

That's if you want to put faith into Facebook to not completely corrupt what news it reports to fit it's agenda. I wouldn't, I seen the movie about Facebook being made.


I personally am sick of all this fake **** being reported too, but there comes a certain point where you have to quit blaming the media outlets and the social networking sites and start blaming the stupid ****ing people that share this **** with out looking into it further because it fits their political views.

Hillary Clinton is fake news.

most news is fake


npr and pbs are nice

pffft

:cool:

.

.

Goofle is fake member.

:shycouch:

so what if they dont accept trump on the 19th

There is no constitutional clause that forces the electors in the Electoral College to abide by the popular vote of their state. That being said, there are safeguards (i.e. penalties, fines, incarceration, etc.) in place in 29 states to make sure that they do.

Although this is true, it's pretty much an idiotic ideal that if they disagree with the choice, they get fined for it. Isn't the electoral college there to have the safety of our country a priority? If they vote for something that they feel is a breach of that safety, why bother having the electoral college?

Right? If you're going to be an oligarchy, at least go balls out with it.

The Electoral College is supposedly in place to ensure that all states, regardless of size, are "fairly" represented. If the election went STRICTLY by the popular vote, one would only have to campaign in and win a handful of major metropolitan cities in order to win the election, thus leaving the remaining 80%+ of the nation without a voice. That is the best explanation that I have heard, anyhow. For the record, the Electoral college is bunk.

I think popular vote is clearly the fairest way. Maine recently implemented ranked-choice voting, which, in my opinion, is tantamount to giving each voter more than 1 vote, which again, is bunk.

Which ends up happening anyways, that's why they campaign and tour hardcore in battleground states and **** the rest of the states that aren't on their radar.

So you are down for a straight up popular vote?

Bu really, who wants their campaign energy? How much of it is genuine?

Might as well, either way a large group of people will be ignored while campaigning.

i wonder if theyll give obama a 3rd term

bump
hillary should have used snapchat way early in the campaign

though all the rednecks who voted for him prolly dont have snapchat

naww,, s'all about that Instagram

but but but Snapchat is the fastest growing social media platform! (a year ago)

Who won? I've haven't been "in the loop" lately.

Shouldn't this thread be closed or something?

lol why?

Because she lost.