Unless a lack of housing is keeping people homeless that sounds ridiculous. Literally does nothing besides satisfy your sadistic ideology about people who are better off than you and lol at your private property agenda as the only "real" answer.

Your whole response is a big pile of bias yikes.

It drives up housing costs and drives out the lower class. SF has absurd housing costs and a massive homeless population because of this. They have something around five vacant investment homes per homeless person.

and you think that restriction is going to allow people digging in the trash for food/water the option to become home owners?

Im sure that has some effect, but seriously, that's where youre going to start on your crusade to end homelessness in America? Typical OH.

Yes. I just explained to you how investor hoarders keep people homeless.

I thought you were like, too intellectual or something for cheap strawman arguments.

It's not a strawman, I recognized the validity in your point. I also think it's a **** starting place.

Are houses affordable for the homeless in other parts of the country where investment hoarding isnt as much of an issue?

If I was going to start a crusade against homelessness Id be calling for improvements to/support for things that make people homeless, like drugs, education, healthcare causing bankruptcy, etc..

It's a pretty valuable way to actually address the root issue instead of putting a bandaid on the situation like most policies do. Plus, you can write like five laws in a row no biggie or even put multiple facets of addressing homelessness on the same bill.

Come into thread
See DWV say "strawman"
Leave thread

Nah, bro.. keep aspiring to be a gas station alcoholic. I support you.

Rude

It's not rude, he said it proudly and I said I support him.