Music Banter
Page 9 of 12 « First 78 9 1011 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Band Polls: Round 5: Final Poll (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/22645-band-polls-round-5-final-poll.html)

Crowe 05-08-2007 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog (Post 365403)
endless terrible threads.
ROFL. And Big3 comes from left field with the burn.

Frances 05-09-2007 07:29 PM
Bowie Bowie Bowie! Heaps better than smelliot smith!

I read a post on this forum (posted by a mod) that said about a Tool album (which one I can't remember, a new one I think) that if you didn't think it was a masterpiece then you hadn't listened to it enough. Well, in that same vein of stupidity, that can apply to Bowie!

So, If you don't vote for Bowie, you just havn't listened to him enough! Withdraw your misguided votes and point them to Bowie!

BOWIE WINS!

Trauma 05-09-2007 09:14 PM
Elliott!

TheBig3 05-09-2007 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe (Post 365434)
ROFL. And Big3 comes from left field with the burn.
That means a lot coming from you crowe. I always appreciate when my comments go on noticed.

sleepy jack 05-10-2007 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBig3KilledMyRainDog (Post 365403)
endless terrible threads.
Theres one elliott smith thread...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frances (Post 365724)

I read a post on this forum (posted by a mod) that said about a Tool album (which one I can't remember, a new one I think) that if you didn't think it was a masterpiece then you hadn't listened to it enough. Well, in that same vein of stupidity, that can apply to Bowie!

So, If you don't vote for Bowie, you just havn't listened to him enough! Withdraw your misguided votes and point them to Bowie!]
People fail at catching sarcasm.

Frances 05-10-2007 10:25 AM
It seems you have! :tramp:

sleepy jack 05-10-2007 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowquill (Post 365137)
I don't understand how you can go on about Mozart being 'amazing' then say this. You realize Mozart didn't start off any genres right? He composed and wrote in a bunch and popularized one, but he didn't create any. You sit here and hype him and but he doesn't fit up to your standards of amazing at all. Why don't you namedrop Montverdi or Bach instead?
I really wanna see Inuzaka Skysword's reply to this.

Kevorkian Logic 05-10-2007 02:46 PM
I am, because that post bothers me.

Mozart is one of the most versatile composers ever, try writing a sonata then an opera then a string quintet, its ****ing hard, much, much harder than anything Elliott Smith has ever done.

To say Mozart is not an amazing musician is a extremely naive thing to do, no offense, I mean just because he was doesn't play the hip indie music that all the kids are listening to doesn't mean he wasn't a good musician, he just lived about 250 years ago.

A_Perfect_Sonnet 05-10-2007 02:48 PM
He didn't write lyrics or sing!

Ooo. Gotcha there.

I respect classical, it's got some wonderful pieces, but it doesn't mean we should hold classical composers above all else. They were just the style at the time.

sleepy jack 05-10-2007 03:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevorkian Logic (Post 365914)
I am, because that post bothers me.

Mozart is one of the most versatile composers ever, try writing a sonata then an opera then a string quintet, its ****ing hard, much, much harder than anything Elliott Smith has ever done.

To say Mozart is not an amazing musician is a extremely naive thing to do, no offense, I mean just because he was doesn't play the hip indie music that all the kids are listening to doesn't mean he wasn't a good musician, he just lived about 250 years ago.
I was going by Inuzaka's standards of amazing.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 PM.
Page 9 of 12 « First 78 9 1011 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.