Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Rate Your Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/24327-rate-your-music.html)

ProggyMan 12-02-2008 11:04 PM

Profile: 3Phil - Rate Your Music
Beastemode.

RoemerMW 12-03-2008 08:29 AM

Profile: roemermw - Rate Your Music

Hello, how are you? 12-10-2008 12:27 AM

huge bump

Rainard Jalen 12-10-2008 04:20 AM

the big problem with RYM is that the website is FLOODED with prog and metal fanboys. it's clear from all the top 100 lists from a certain point in time onwards that there is a ridiculous, ABSURD bias in favour of REALLY niche varieties of metal (including the most extreme types of metal) and silly little nu-prog records firmly rooted in the early 70s with virtually nothing to offer the modern musical landscape.

jackhammer 12-10-2008 06:20 AM

I don't use RYM for reco's though at all. It's handy to keep track and create my own lists from etc.

Urban Hat€monger ? 12-10-2008 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen (Post 561388)
the big problem with RYM is that the website is FLOODED with prog and metal fanboys. it's clear from all the top 100 lists from a certain point in time onwards that there is a ridiculous, ABSURD bias in favour of REALLY niche varieties of metal (including the most extreme types of metal) and silly little nu-prog records firmly rooted in the early 70s with virtually nothing to offer the modern musical landscape.

Yeah , I had an idea to do something a while back and I figured their top 100 lists might be a good thing to base it on thinking it would be more diverse than most other sites. I looked at one top 100 (2003 I think) and the list seemed to be about 70% metal / prog / progmetal albums.

Needless to say I gave up.

ProggyMan 12-10-2008 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen (Post 561388)
the big problem with RYM is that the website is FLOODED with prog and metal fanboys. it's clear from all the top 100 lists from a certain point in time onwards that there is a ridiculous, ABSURD bias in favour of REALLY niche varieties of metal (including the most extreme types of metal) and silly little nu-prog records firmly rooted in the early 70s with virtually nothing to offer the modern musical landscape.

That's unfair, there's just a bunch of metalheads who come on and rate a bunch of **** 5 stars and .5 stars which skews the ratings.

Zombeels 12-10-2008 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProggyMan (Post 561919)
That's unfair, there's just a bunch of metalheads who come on and rate a bunch of **** 5 stars and .5 stars which skews the ratings.

I actually know a few metalheads on the site and they tell me most metalheads have multiple accounts which boosts these ****tty metal albums even higher.

ProggyMan 12-10-2008 08:42 PM

Yeh, especially since more ratings boost rankings.

Hello, how are you? 12-10-2008 09:10 PM

Ratings on rym are weighted so ratings by someone with multiple accounts, unless all their accounts are highly weighted won't do much so the top albums is pretty reflective of the rym community.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.