Ninetales |
12-15-2014 05:21 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zer0
(Post 1523560)
I gave up on RYM a few months back and it was probably one of the most musically liberating things I've ever done. I realised that rating and cataloging every single thing I listen to was completely pointless.
I think that they should change their rating system so that you can only rate an album a year after its official release. This will give time for people to form a proper opinion of a release instead of rating it after only one play. There also seems to be a serious genre bias in the charts. There's no way that there could be so many atmospheric black metal, death metal or progressive rock/metal albums rated so highly compared to other genres of music. Don't get me wrong I love a lot of that stuff, but when you see very average atmospheric black metal albums being rated over the best dream pop albums of the year I really do raise question as to how people rate albums.
|
odd, I find that the number of metal albums on their rankings refreshing. I mean I don't think theres an outrageous amount of those genres compared to the usual suspects. Especially when I look at publications year end lists, it always annoys me at the lack of any metal (last year it was Sunbather or nothing, this year it's been what Heathen on a few, The Satanist maybe.. not much there). So RYM having some metal compared to other sites is nice. That being said, I don't take their ratings very seriously anyway.
its impossible to be completely equal for all genres anyways f.ex RYM is not a good resource for finding ambient or drone albums amongst their lists.
in terms of using it, I tried to catalogue all the albums ive heard there (the ratings weren't as important to me, it was more of a reference point for what ive heard so I don't forget). But I abandoned that like a year ago. way too much work and I hadn't even finished rating all the stuff I had heard in the past, let alone continuing to listen to.
|