Bands changing their sound
You always hear about bands having a "sophmore slump" mostly because of them changing their sound. My question is why do most bands do this? I love their first CD and buy their second CD in hopes of having that same great sound, but they change it and disappoint. Is there reasoning behind this?
|
Bands evolve or want to try something new instead of recycling the same sound until they break up.
|
There are very few bands that can get away with not evolving and still retain a following. In these days of commercialism, I would not be surprised to hear record company inteference playing a huge part in band's music.
|
Quote:
|
Progression?
|
Quote:
|
Well, a lot of artists excelled by finding a niche and exploring as many possible avenues as they could within that niche and similarly so have a lot of musicians. Showing breadth is largely just a case of trying to impress people, rather than creating truly quality music.
|
Quote:
|
Or bands want money
|
Quote:
|
It's hard for the change not to feel like a betrayal, when the band has built up a fanbase due to the style with which they wrote and performed in the past and then drops it without warning. Of course, bands are made up of real people, who happen to be artists and need to be able to express themselves in a form most suited to the current state of their lives. Sometimes bands just mature or develop new interests. I think the best solution is a compromise, in which a band still has their trademark sound at its core, but tries some new things in some of its songs to stretch out of the old boundaries ( for an example, see Belle & Sebastian's The Life Pursuit).
|
IF you put out the same sounding CD most bands will get bored so they change. Some bands are static like AC/DC
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.