Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Is music dead as of 2008? (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/29552-music-dead-2008-a.html)

boo boo 04-01-2008 01:06 PM

Examples of what?

What I don't like?

Well damn. It would be a rather long list if I had to name everyone, so I'll just keep it small and pick out the main culprits.

Modest Mouse..... SURPRISE =D
Feist
Patrick Wolf
Bright Eyes
Interpol
Von Bondies
Yeah Yeah Yeahs
Broken Social Scene
Devendra Banhart

sleepy jack 04-01-2008 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enemyat_thesix (Post 462230)
whoops, I never said music had to be new or groundbreaking to be "good".


you lose.


and rainard, I listen to quite a deal of non-EDM, though increasingly less so as it all becomes the same. to be quite honest, i've become quite jaded. name a band, and, if i've heard them, i can probably name at least 2 other bands that sound like them.

whoops, I never said you said that I said by your logic.


you lose.

adidasss 04-01-2008 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 462371)
Examples of what?

"of the quality of the music that defines the so called scene."

boo boo 04-01-2008 01:21 PM

Sorry, my edit was a little late. :(

Urban Hat€monger ? 04-01-2008 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 462371)
Examples of what?

What I don't like?

Well damn. It would be a rather long list if I had to name everyone, so I'll just keep it small and pick out the main culprits.

Modest Mouse..... SURPRISE =D
Feist
Patrick Wolf
Bright Eyes
Interpol
Von Bondies
Yeah Yeah Yeahs
Broken Social Scene
Devendra Banhart

HE said 2008 not 2003

boo boo 04-01-2008 01:26 PM

I don't recall him asking for artists that are popular now, I thought he meant in general.

I don't even post on anything relating to Indie anymore, so I have absolutely no idea whats popular now, and I'm fine with that.

adidasss 04-01-2008 01:29 PM

Any "indie" bands you do like?

boo boo 04-01-2008 01:47 PM

Certainly. Not many that are popular now, save Flaming Lips, My Morning Jacket and Neutral Milk Hotel, like a little Arcade Fire as well.

Most of the indie I like is 80s and 90s. Pixies, Sonic Youth, My Bloody Valentine, dEUS, Pavement, stuff like that.

I also like post and math rock, which is associated with Indie, but oddly enough, also associated with prog.

Rainard Jalen 04-01-2008 01:55 PM

It is true, indie's come full circle. Prog bands like Battles (did anybody actually like "Mirrored" from last year?) are now considered indie.

I would say though that on the basis of what you've written boo boo, you're probably more affiliated with "mainstream" indie and may not have heard enough of the scene on the whole.

Piss Me Off 04-01-2008 02:02 PM

I didn't really like Mirrored, but i remember a lot of people raving about them.

Rainard Jalen 04-01-2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piss Me Off (Post 462398)
I didn't really like Mirrored, but i remember a lot of people raving about them.

You mean online, or in "real life"? I can't imagine coming across a person who could lay claim to liking Mirrored.

sleepy jack 04-01-2008 03:05 PM

I can't imagine even running across very many people who'd heard of Battles in real life.

Piss Me Off 04-01-2008 03:06 PM

Online, no one actually knows about these bands irl.

chartsengrafs 04-01-2008 03:11 PM

^ agreed.

The Bearcat 04-01-2008 03:14 PM

I think paying attention to indie bands is like working in a Siagon sweatshop, hours of hard labour involved with nothing great to show for it, except for knowing obscure bands that your freinds dont, than holding over their heads..... if anyones into that sort of thing......

but there are worse hobbies out there.....

adidasss 04-01-2008 03:29 PM

Those of us that actually do like the music, don't mind putting effort into finding good bands...we also do it because we enjoy the music, if the people that surround us actually cared what we listen to I'd imagine we wouldn't go searching for an on-line message board in hopes of finding kindred spirits...:\

The Bearcat 04-01-2008 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss (Post 462444)
Those of us that actually do like the music, don't mind putting effort into finding good bands...

hey, it aint a bad hobbie, whatever floats your boat captain :D

Rainard Jalen 04-01-2008 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bearcat (Post 462452)
hey, it aint a bad hobbie, whatever floats your boat captain :D

It ain't a bad hobby? What the HELL are you doing on a music message board?!!!

jacklovezhimself 04-01-2008 05:10 PM

Wow this has become a big bitchy argument full of annoying contradictions and bickering. I forgot what the question was.

Friday 04-01-2008 05:15 PM

[QUOTE=nothing great to show for it, except for knowing obscure bands that your freinds dont, than holding over their heads..... if anyones into that sort of thing......
/QUOTE]

Haha, I would say at least 90% of this board are into that sort of thing. Me included.

mr dave 04-01-2008 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen (Post 462456)
It ain't a bad hobby? What the HELL are you doing on a music message board?!!!

probably the same as most other members. letting a small minority of users do the work then snagging band names while avoiding the elitism hahaha

Rubberchicken 04-01-2008 08:09 PM

I listen to whatever pitchfork reviews.. I hate the music I listen to aswell. But I am cool. RIght>?>

enemyat_thesix 04-01-2008 11:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rainard Jalen (Post 462339)
The crucial question being whether those 2 bands came afterwards or before...

Any new sound will be quickly copied. Why should that be a reason to become jaded?

maybe jaded is the wrong word. i've just outgrown melodramatic indie pop and tired-ass indie rock :yikes:

Rainard Jalen 04-02-2008 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rubberchicken (Post 462580)
I listen to whatever pitchfork reviews.. I hate the music I listen to aswell. But I am cool. RIght>?>

Your insinuation that Pitchfork listeners do not even like what they listen to and just do it to be cool is pretty much the height of arrogance.

Friday 04-02-2008 01:38 AM

Even if 'music is dead' as you stated. Is that to say you feel you've heard everything you could of years gone by?
Most of BIG moments with albums were not new albums at all. Just things I hadn't heard before.
Basically, if music was dead. I think we would still have enough of a back catalogue to keep us going for a while.

Rubberchicken 04-02-2008 01:39 AM

Rainard Jalen>>> It was more of a dig at the orignal poster, suggesting that maybe he needs to widen his scope of sources for new music. It that is the problem.. I don't know.

Seltzer 04-02-2008 03:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 462278)
What constitutes good music is sub...........


Aaghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y28...dead-horse.gif

That annoys me... when people talk of music with 'good bass', it nowadays seldomly means that it actually has a well-written bassline. More just that it's loud.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacklovezhimself (Post 462481)
Wow this has become a big bitchy argument full of annoying contradictions and bickering. I forgot what the question was.

Given the thread question, I'd say a thread full of contradictions and bickering was expected from the outset.

Friday 04-02-2008 03:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seltzer (Post 462770)
That annoys me... when people talk of music with 'good bass', it nowadays seldomly means that it actually has a well-written bassline. More just that it's loud.

Bassline seems to be growing increasingly popular in the UK. I like to see you question the basslines used in that.

Seltzer 04-02-2008 03:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Friday (Post 462772)
Bassline seems to be growing increasingly popular in the UK. I like to see you question the basslines used in that.

I think you misunderstood where I was coming from. My post wasn't intended to be read in the sense that I think there are no good basslines nowadays (because that's not true).

I'm just referring to some of the rubbish 'basslines' which seem to be rife nowadays... you know... the kids who just want to beef up their sound system and take their cars for a spin with the deepest bass possible. There seems to be a widening riff between 'loud' bass and well-written basslines.

Friday 04-02-2008 03:44 AM

I think you'll possibly see that change. I think the two will merge soon. I, personally, quite like this whole fascination with sub bass though, to be fair. :)

Rubberchicken 04-02-2008 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seltzer (Post 462770)
Given the thread question, I'd say a thread full of contradictions and bickering was expected from the outset.

.

adidasss 04-02-2008 04:27 AM

[QUOTE=Friday;462485]
Quote:

Originally Posted by nothing great to show for it, except for knowing obscure bands that your freinds dont, than holding over their heads..... if anyones into that sort of thing......
/QUOTE

Haha, I would say at least 90% of this board are into that sort of thing. Me included.

Haha, I would say you're a retard who likes to generalize...haha...:rolleyes:

boo boo 04-02-2008 06:49 AM

So, is it bad that thats probably something I would say?

Rainard Jalen 04-02-2008 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bearcat (Post 462442)
I think paying attention to indie bands is like working in a Siagon sweatshop, hours of hard labour involved with nothing great to show for it, except for knowing obscure bands that your freinds dont, than holding over their heads..... if anyones into that sort of thing......

but there are worse hobbies out there.....

Nothing great to "show for it"? Since when was listening to music about showing off something to friends? Well, guess what? It isn't! It's about finding personal, yes, PERSONAL enjoyment in something. So all those "hours of hard labour" do in fact result in good things, but strictly for the person himself. Chances are he derives a greater diversity of pleasures from music than people who just listen to the same old rubbish all the time. That is, U2, Keane, Snow Patrol, Razorlight, and the rest of the adult alternative RUBBISH on Virgin Radio.

adidasss 04-02-2008 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boo boo (Post 462810)
So, is it bad that thats probably something I would say?

Yes, because that would be a wild assumption without any basis in reality. Unless you mean to prove me wrong.:\

I'm not sure why it's so hard to believe that some people are so crazy about music, that they spend quite a bit of time on finding something new and exciting. I don't know about you, but few experiences in life can compare to hearing some brilliant music for the first time...speaking from personal experience, it's become sort of an obsession, like a drug of sorts, I constantly need a new fix. Indie just happens to be an incredibly wast and diverse territory to explore (seeing as how nowadays practically anyone with a microphone can put their material out there). There's thousands of small bands out there that will never be on TRL and are just waiting to be discovered. If you have an open mind and you're willing to search a bit...

Clepera 04-02-2008 12:47 PM

Well sort of...

Like there are some good songs. But I still love older music better than modern day

mr dave 04-02-2008 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss (Post 462821)
Yes, because that would be a wild assumption without any basis in reality. Unless you mean to prove me wrong.:\

I'm not sure why it's so hard to believe that some people are so crazy about music, that they spend quite a bit of time on finding something new and exciting. I don't know about you, but few experiences in life can compare to hearing some brilliant music for the first time...speaking from personal experience, it's become sort of an obsession, like a drug of sorts, I constantly need a new fix. Indie just happens to be an incredibly wast and diverse territory to explore (seeing as how nowadays practically anyone with a microphone can put their material out there). There's thousands of small bands out there that will never be on TRL and are just waiting to be discovered. If you have an open mind and you're willing to search a bit...

i totally understand you're POV. been there, done that - i called it college haha.

i think there's one other downside to the way you describe independent music though. where you're spot on about how anyone with a mic can release music, it also makes it really easy for groups to simply disappear. i'm not saying it's a reason to abandon looking for new stuff. but it can be disheartening for someone starting out to find a great band online and then - poof. a webpage that never updates again and knowledge of an album you'll never get unless you travel to a remote little town somewhere on the other side of the planet.

like you said, it's like a drug. some people will keep chasing the dragon. others will chose to walk away. and others, like the bearcat implied, will simply use their knowledge to assert some level of perceived intellectual superiority over their peers to cover up some other insecurity from within their psyches.

Davey Moore 04-02-2008 02:34 PM

I don't think quality music is as mainstream as it was previously, record companies are more concerned with quarterly profits, rather than developing artists. There are geniuses out there, making really great music, but I can't find any, I don't browse around enough.

Friday 04-02-2008 02:34 PM

[QUOTE=adidasss;462789]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Friday (Post 462485)
Haha, I would say you're a retard who likes to generalize...haha...:rolleyes:

I include myself in that previous statement. But if you wish to get all defensive then go right ahead. :thumb:

adidasss 04-02-2008 02:42 PM

How does that change the fact that you made a stupid generalization? I'm glad that you admit to being a poseur, but let's not try to pin that label on "90% of this board" aye?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 AM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.