Accepting that John Lennon was a douchebag is much like accepting death
 

LOL, I got a real kick out of this article. What do yuo guys think?


didntread.com/music/accepting-that-john-lennon-was-a-douchebag-is-much-like-the-five-stages-of-death.html

It's a pretty funny article but I've never met a Lennon fan (an actual Lennon fan, not someone who just runs around going GIVE PEACE A CHANCE) who isn't aware he was a douchebag.

Ive always found it rather easy to accept both.

Yeah, both John and Paul were douchebags, but John was by far the biggest. At least Paul didn't abandon his son at the age of five and ignored him for the next 12 years. The only reason Paul gets so much more crap is because everyone starts to admire a person as soon as they're murdered. Just look at JFK.

JFK was a terrible musician.

John Lennon was a misogynistic, grumpy bastard who told people what they didn't want to hear and that's why I love him

I'm still in the denial stage.

but he wrote Sexy Sadie

so he pwns us all

with the 'wawa' indian backing vocals. hellz yeah. but even there he was sticking it to the Maharishi. Which frankly he probably deserved

so is lance armstrong, tiger woods, and most anyone else who is one of the best at what they do. i dont mean to say you cant be great at what you do and still be a good person; its just kinda hard not to be a son of a bitch when everyone wants to be you.