I didn't know where to put this, but I need music help. (band) - Music Banter Music Banter

Go Back   Music Banter > The Music Forums > General Music
Register Blogging Today's Posts
Welcome to Music Banter Forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with over 70,000 other registered members. After you create your free account, you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 1,100,000 posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2008, 01:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Veronica Lodge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Riverdale.
Posts: 174
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion, but the general consensus, in the history books as you say, is that they were not a punk band but rather a glam band or at most a protopunk band. And if you want to get into a who came first discussion, the Velvet Underground predate the New York Dolls by six years.
Again, I'm sorry, I disagree. (And I can totally understand why you would disagree with me.)

I don't think the Ramone's were the first punk band. They were the first SUCCESSFUL punk band (with the Sex Pistols), however TNYD were the beginnings of punk. They fused glam rock with a new genre - punk. Their own.

(Also, I feel really bad that we totally took over Tobias' thread about the origins of punk. - However, everyone's opinions are super interesting...)
__________________
- Veronica Lodge -


Yes, that IS what I said.
Veronica Lodge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 01:42 PM   #62 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
The New York Dolls weren't doing anything The Rolling Stones weren't doing already. Never heard anyone say they started punk though.

The Deviants were doing the whole 'punk rock' thing in 1966 / 67.
It didn't take off then , Why?
Because people weren't ready for it. They even had a whole scene behind them , the whole UK counter culture scene.

But they never got being above a cult band because they didn't sell any records , so yes sales DO have a lot to do with it.

Punk would have never taken off the way it did if the Pistols hadn't been top of the charts & been on prime time TV.
I don't suppose you'd be able to hook a guy up with that one by any chance?
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 01:43 PM   #63 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

I'll see what I can do
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 01:49 PM   #64 (permalink)
Mate, Spawn & Die
 
Janszoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Rapping Community
Posts: 24,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica Lodge View Post
Again, I'm sorry, I disagree. (And I can totally understand why you would disagree with me.)

I don't think the Ramone's were the first punk band. They were the first SUCCESSFUL punk band (with the Sex Pistols), however TNYD were the beginnings of punk. They fused glam rock with a new genre - punk. Their own.
But the Ramones weren't successful. They didn't start getting much in the way of attention until much later in their career. The fact of the matter is that nobody—not the Ramones, not the New York Dolls—simply invented punk out of thin air. It evolved its way into existence and it didn't have a particularly codified sound until the 80s, a time when many people were proclaiming it dead. People describe the Ramones as the fathers of punk because (a) they represent more of a departure from 70s pop rock than a band like the New York Dolls do and (b) because they were one of the early bands featured in Punk magazine.
Janszoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 01:52 PM   #65 (permalink)
The Sexual Intellectual
 
Urban Hat€monger ?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere cooler than you
Posts: 18,605
Default

The whole of the End Of The Century album was the Ramones basically saying to their record company 'We're not just some over the hill fad band , please don't drop us'.
__________________



Urb's RYM Stuff

Most people sell their soul to the devil, but the devil sells his soul to Nick Cave.
Urban Hat€monger ? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 03:04 PM   #66 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Tobias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica Lodge View Post
This is why I think most people shouldn't catergorize music.

I think the general public doesn't really know ENOUGH about music to categorize it. Thankfully, there are people out there not like this, and most people on MB are said people.

One of the things that really really urks me especially is this discussion of punk, and its forefathers. If people actually looked in books and researched, they would know the story and evolution of punk.

In all honesty, I think everyone is entitled to their opinion, but their opinion is only valid if its an educated one.

With that being said, I'm going to direct this next bit to Tobias. I think it's great that you are willing to learn more about music and branch out. But forget about catergorizing music. Forget about putting a label on it. Genres were designed to direct kids in records stores where to put the album on a shelf. Listen to what you want, for real real, and don't be focused on what's punk, and whats pop-punk. In the end, it's all the same - it's music.
I agree...that's why I have not learned about this genre placement. However it is hard to find music that I would like in a place like this which is categorized.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
Hell no! For example, the Beach Boys were pop and they totally kicked ass.


The Ramones were the fathers of punk, but their sound was also a throwback to early 60s pop rock. It went against the grain because that's not what pop music sounded like in 70s, but their music still definitely had a pop quality to it.
Fair enough. Beach Boys were the ****

Quote:
Originally Posted by Veronica Lodge View Post
(Also, I feel really bad that we totally took over Tobias' thread about the origins of punk. - However, everyone's opinions are super interesting...)
It's cool, i'm learning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
I don't suppose you'd be able to hook a guy up with that one by any chance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urban Hatemonger View Post
I'll see what I can do
Me too!!

Also, any way I can get the best album from each of the bands listed in this thread? or at least a few songs to judge them by?
Tobias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 03:05 PM   #67 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default

I can help out. What specific bands?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 03:45 PM   #68 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Tobias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 60
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FaSho View Post
I can help out. What specific bands?
pretty much the ones you posted

along with some of the other bands that were posted
Tobias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 03:55 PM   #69 (permalink)
____
 
FaSho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 5,279
Default

Will do.
Be excpecting a PM.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Janszoon View Post
What? No. No. No. No no no.
FaSho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2008, 04:39 PM   #70 (permalink)
Music Addict
 
Tobias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 60
Default

Sweet!!
Tobias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads



© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.