Live performance or studio recording?

MusicGateway · 11-05-2012, 06:23 AM

If you're going to listen to a band or artist, would you:

Prefer to listen to a live recording of them at a gig? (let's say the recording is good quality though)

OR

prefer to listen to their studio recordings?

I'm curious, because I seem to take the opposite view to most others I've asked. 9/10 times I'd much rather listen to a studio recording than a live gig recording. I've always presumed this was the way most people thought but it's becoming increasingly apparent that it's not!

**Janszoon** · 11-05-2012, 07:31 AM

Totally depends who it is. With jazz, for example, I tend to prefer live recordings, but with metal I definitely prefer studio.

Chives · 11-05-2012, 07:56 AM

I think I'd have to go with studio recordings. I'm in love with the recording studio. Live stuff has its merits but I rarely get too excited over them.

I agree with what Janszoon, though. I'd find stuff like jazz done live much more appealing than, say, most rock artists. Maybe to the point where I'd treat the two equally.

Rock N' Roll Clown · 11-05-2012, 08:28 AM

Well, besides the jazz, I prefer the blues live performances than the studio recordings. But, anyway, when I'm interested in an artist and I don't know his songs I go for the studio stuff to see what it's about. And if I know some of the songs and I'm starting to like the artist I'm more interested in his live shows, because it's very important to see if this artist is a good showman or just a music-man

Isbjørn · 11-05-2012, 08:41 AM

I once went to a Kaizers Orchestra concert, it was craaazy. But with records, I prefer studio. You can go back and fix stuff in a studio.

JustJunMC · 11-05-2012, 09:31 PM

A mix of both

DjNexus · 11-06-2012, 04:20 PM

I would say studio recording because they are placed in an environment that controls the sound and makes it sound the best. In some cases I would rather go to a show just because it's more wild and the sound is heavy .!

Freebase Dali · 11-06-2012, 07:00 PM

As others have said, it really depends on the kind of music.

You definitely want to hear primarily acoustic music live, but a recording of that live performance also has a bit of that sound that tends to get lost in studio recordings. Most types of primarily electronic music is excellent live as well, but horribly represented in a live recording. In general, anything with heavily distorted guitars is usually more coherent in a studio recording. I also prefer more production-specific and nuanced music in a studio recording.

DjNexus · 11-06-2012, 08:37 PM

Yea.. It definitely has a lot to do with the type of music.

Jmeezy · 11-07-2012, 07:59 PM

Depends on the genre

11-05-2012, 06:23 AM	#1 (permalink)
MusicGateway Groupie Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Global Posts: 3	Live performance or studio recording? If you're going to listen to a band or artist, would you: Prefer to listen to a live recording of them at a gig? (let's say the recording is good quality though) OR prefer to listen to their studio recordings? I'm curious, because I seem to take the opposite view to most others I've asked. 9/10 times I'd much rather listen to a studio recording than a live gig recording. I've always presumed this was the way most people thought but it's becoming increasingly apparent that it's not! __________________ It's gonna the most useful thing since the invention of the fork.. Or maybe soap. Not sure yet

11-05-2012, 07:31 AM	#2 (permalink)
Janszoon Mate, Spawn & Die Join Date: May 2007 Location: The Rapping Community Posts: 24,593	Totally depends who it is. With jazz, for example, I tend to prefer live recordings, but with metal I definitely prefer studio. __________________ A Night in the Life of the Invisible Man Time & Place 25 Albums You Should Hear Before the Moon Crashes into the Earth and We All Die last.fm

11-05-2012, 07:56 AM	#3 (permalink)
Chives Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Tacoma, WA Posts: 299	I think I'd have to go with studio recordings. I'm in love with the recording studio. Live stuff has its merits but I rarely get too excited over them. I agree with what Janszoon, though. I'd find stuff like jazz done live much more appealing than, say, most rock artists. Maybe to the point where I'd treat the two equally. __________________ [My last.fm] [My Tumblr]

11-05-2012, 08:28 AM	#4 (permalink)
Rock N' Roll Clown Music Addict Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Bulgaria Posts: 169	Well, besides the jazz, I prefer the blues live performances than the studio recordings. But, anyway, when I'm interested in an artist and I don't know his songs I go for the studio stuff to see what it's about. And if I know some of the songs and I'm starting to like the artist I'm more interested in his live shows, because it's very important to see if this artist is a good showman or just a music-man __________________

11-05-2012, 08:41 AM	#5 (permalink)
Isbjørn cooler commie than elph Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: In a hole, help Posts: 2,811	I once went to a Kaizers Orchestra concert, it was craaazy. But with records, I prefer studio. You can go back and fix stuff in a studio. __________________ fast(ml) Hear me play the guitar Look, mom! I got a journal

11-05-2012, 09:31 PM	#6 (permalink)
JustJunMC Music Addict Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Hongcouver & Global Posts: 125	A mix of both __________________ So now I cant even post my own nickname in my signature or have an avatar of a graphic design I made that has my username on here? I dont know who is doing it but please provide a legit reason why my material is suddenly being singled out. Thanks

11-06-2012, 04:20 PM	#7 (permalink)
DjNexus Groupie Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 27	I would say studio recording because they are placed in an environment that controls the sound and makes it sound the best. In some cases I would rather go to a show just because it's more wild and the sound is heavy .!

11-06-2012, 07:00 PM	#8 (permalink)
Freebase Dali Partying on the inside Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 5,584	As others have said, it really depends on the kind of music. You definitely want to hear primarily acoustic music live, but a recording of that live performance also has a bit of that sound that tends to get lost in studio recordings. Most types of primarily electronic music is excellent live as well, but horribly represented in a live recording. In general, anything with heavily distorted guitars is usually more coherent in a studio recording. I also prefer more production-specific and nuanced music in a studio recording. __________________

11-06-2012, 08:37 PM	#9 (permalink)
DjNexus Groupie Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 27	Yea.. It definitely has a lot to do with the type of music. __________________ You haven't been here long enough to post links to your music, please read our rules. http://www.musicbanter.com/introduct...res-today.html

11-07-2012, 07:59 PM	#10 (permalink)
Jmeezy Groupie Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 16	Depends on the genre