Music Banter
Page 11 of 250 « First 910 11 12132161111 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   General Music (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/)
-   -   Big Four Bands Thread Round 19: Gothic Rock (https://www.musicbanter.com/general-music/86775-big-four-bands-thread-round-19-gothic-rock.html)

JGuy Grungeman 07-11-2016 02:08 PM
Well it's not likely the big 4's we vote for will be official, so what's wrong with doing an unofficial one for the fun of it?

Blank. 07-11-2016 02:14 PM
Nothing at all.

William_the_Bloody 07-11-2016 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by elphenor (Post 1719105)
Translation: I already have my flat screen TV so **** everyone else
I care...I care quite a bit love, I just think that the ideas of Chomsky and Klein would reduce the life expectancy of the people they're advocating for, not increase it. Particularly here in North America.

Ps, I don't own a flatscreen tv. :p:

YorkeDaddy 07-11-2016 03:20 PM
Again, discussions on the big 4 of those genres have been had here already. It's not particularly interesting to me and likely most of us at this point

Frownland 07-11-2016 03:24 PM
I'm cool with it.

The Batlord 07-11-2016 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGuy Grungeman (Post 1719101)
Nah, even subgenres are allowed, because they still qualify as punk. Back on RYM, there was a criteria, but I don't want a kind of "RYM is genre king" kind of feel on MB. If people want a more restrictive criteria, I'll try to come up with one, but it'll be pretty hard. I mean, if no subgenres are allowed, we can't include art punk, skate punk, synthpunk... so we couldn't include Wire, Devo, Television, and Clash because they generally qualify as "art punk." Plus, I don't want to drawe a line between hardcore and punk for that same reason.
I would not advise that. If we're gonna have more restrictive criteria it should be more democratic, cause whenever you try to define genres you get ten tons of **** for it. Just sayin'.

Neapolitan 07-11-2016 06:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Batlord (Post 1719164)
I would not advise that. If we're gonna have more restrictive criteria it should be more democratic, cause whenever you try to define genres you get ten tons of **** for it. Just sayin'.
He wouldn't get any it if he wasn't disseminating misinformation.

edit: Most of those bands are not exclusively "Art Punk" so I don't see the problem he's complaining about. First time I seen The Clash described as "Art Punk." He left out the Talking Heads, which were actually from an art school.

Blank. 07-11-2016 06:44 PM
I think we should do surgenres. Plus I don't see any reason why, say a band like black flag, can't be considered big four in hardcore punk as well as punk rock.

TechnicLePanther 07-11-2016 07:13 PM
I say we count out Dead Kennedys and go with Stooges, Clash, Pistols, and Ramones.

DeadChannel 07-11-2016 09:32 PM
Dead Kennedys are the best band on that list, though.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.
Page 11 of 250 « First 910 11 12132161111 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.