I wouldn't mind writing long pieces, but it's clear about the receiving end and ends up being a complete waste.
Good to see you back Paed.

https://f4.bcbits.com/img/a2713940619_16.jpg
Artist/Album: Drakkar Nowhere - Drakkar Nowhere
Year: 2016

Quick Thoughts: Perhaps one of the best discoveries made through another member of this site. This album has left such a long lasting impression of me since the day I listened to it. I was so intrigued by the cover alone, and the music within is nothing short of absolutely amazing.

Best Track: I honestly can't choose. They're all great.

Worth Checking Out?: Um, hell yes. Do yourself and listen to this album right now.

Rating of 1 to 10?: 9.5-9.8. It's nearly perfect.

http://cdn.albumoftheyear.org/album/79208-anyone.jpg
Artist/Album: Swim Mountain - Anyone
Year: 2017

Quick Thoughts: Holy ****

Best Track: All of them.

Worth Checking Out?: Holy **** yes.

Rating of 1 to 10?: A full on perfect 10. Four tracks of just pure genius

You should at least put the genre.... It will give some more context for your readers.

I like to keep it a mystery. No expectations are better than misleading ones.

What the **** is misleading about a genre?

Kiiii doesn't know sh*t about genres.

Nothing. I just don't want people to expect something out of the genre only to be disappointed. My best experiences with music has been that I have no idea what it's supposed to be.

Well yes, this too. But my other point still stands.

Seems like it...


Not that my opinion matters in this case, but I don't think many people on here are gonna be disappointed by the fact you labeled an album correctly. They might get upset if you mislabel it but other than that I don't really see your point. But, it is your thread after all...