Quote:
You can't get much more liquid than that. |
Quote:
|
You said genres. Which implied all genres which is inherently false. And do you really want all of us posting all of the albums we listened to in those threads? It's to keep them free of clutter.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Oh, right, this is why I left.
|
Quote:
So, the threads where people post albums that they are listening to are only to be used sometimes? When? Every third album ... maybe seventh? ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't care what you post and where you post it. I have my own thread to allow discussion for the albums I listen to and to help me keep track of what I have listened to this year. |
Quote:
https://img.memesuper.com/776eab7fa8...e_259-194.jpeg Quote:
|
nah it's cool. i just see no reason to continue it if i'm doing it incorrectly. i'll let you guys keep doing what you do.
i mean i did start this thread by saying it's pretty much destined to fail. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe you should write to all those bands that fit (purposely, mostly) into various genres and tell them that they are only allowed ONE, that's it! - just ONE genre buddy! As for your own thread, you can, of course, do what you want. Nobody said you should stop. Not sure where you're getting that idea. Just curious. Do your research and tell me the ONE genre where this has to be: |
Quote:
EDIT: Sorry Kiiii, that was the last one. |
I guess the point is that a lot of music does fit into one, or more, genres, while nobody is saying there isn't music that can't be categorised. Hell, I've even used a genre "WTF?" to label some music I've listened to! :laughing:
Now make up, boys, and give Ki back his thread. :) |
your response to me has been totally about your rigidity of genres:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
rostasi is basically a musical encyclopedia so idk if arguing with him on this on is gonna get you anywhere
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
go ahead and lock this thread.
|
Quote:
By saying a genre is liquid, means that the genre is changing, or able to be changed. That is simply not the case. What you are probably meaning is bands and artists can be liquid with their music. Which yes.... I agree with that. No one said Gorguts couldn't go and make a psych rock record. Genres are meant for categorization and recommendations, they are not guidelines. |
Quote:
I like your thread Kiiii. You should continue it. |
Quote:
then states that he thinks that the idea of set-in-stone is asinine. |
Quote:
Also, the point (yet again!) is that Kiiii shouldn't have to add genres if he doesn't want to, so stating that record is {blank -just one} genre is often meaningless. Plus, people will give him crap over it if "he gets it wrong." |
Quote:
I'm sorry. I shouldn't have pushed it this far. I apologize to Kiii for ****ing up his thread. I apologize to rostasi for letting my emotions get in front of my debate skills (or lack there of) Just move along.... |
Quote:
Also you don't have to continue today. Take a little break and come back to the thread later on. You did post like five or six albums back to back right away. |
Yeah, Kiiii! Keep it going if you want.
Just don't let others dictate. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
multiple genres within a single tune and/or genres in flux that sometimes don't take new names. Rap music now is not the same rap music of the '70s - even if an artist still wants to call it that today or if (s)he calls it by some slight variation. |
let me sulk in my own despair and stupidity.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Seriously, **** everyone Ki, just go with it. My threads get derailed all the time (often by you) so just roll with it. Hey, at least it's not being ignored. No tumbleweed here! Final point on genre tagging: I just would prefer a basic idea of what the album is (hip-hop/ambient/metal etc) - nothing has to be set in stone. But it would be nice. It is, however, up to his Kiness, so, you know... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
you can't make me.
|
Quote:
|
come at me, ****ers
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 AM. |
© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.