Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Indie & Alternative (https://www.musicbanter.com/indie-alternative/)
-   -   Weezer (https://www.musicbanter.com/indie-alternative/716-weezer.html)

phallpdx 06-01-2008 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Piss Me Off (Post 486290)
That post was a year old though :s

... wow... I am an Idiot... With a capital I... :bonkhead:

Whatsitoosit 06-19-2008 01:16 PM

I downloaded the new album... first impression "OH MAN THIS SUCKS DONKEY ****". I'll listen a few more times as always and see if I eventually force myself to like it. I must be a fanatic, I keep buying their albums and talking myself into liking it. This one will be a challenge though... it's unfortunate, they really are/were one of my favorite bands.

mamanuthead 06-20-2008 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whatsitoosit (Post 491676)
they really are/were one of my favorite bands.

It's ok toosit, sometimes you just gotta let go... (((hugs))) :D

Whatsitoosit 06-20-2008 08:12 AM

I know, I know... (sigh)

the_dp 06-20-2008 06:16 PM

i don't think Weezer ever grew from the first album. every song produced afterwards (except for the wretched dreck from Maladroit) sounded like it could have been on any album. They have three types of songs: sweater song, buddy holly, and island in the sun. Every song other than those sounds like one of those three.

the shame is that they have the playing ability, they just lack the writing ability. i think they have been pretty boring since the second album. I wouldn't go see them even with free tickets.

AsherM 07-03-2008 12:04 AM

Pinkerton followed by Blue. Weezer can slag but when they're good, they're very good.

Whatsitoosit 07-11-2008 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsherM (Post 494719)
Pinkerton followed by Blue. Weezer can slag but when they're good, they're very good.

They need to be good in the 2000's, what are they waiting for?

AsherM 07-22-2008 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whatsitoosit (Post 496926)
They need to be good in the 2000's, what are they waiting for?

Lol good point. Well, I don't know how I would feel if I weren't a Weezer fan, but I think Red album was a pretty good effort. It at least sounds like they're trying to be original again. Rivers Cuomo's Home Alone Recordings was pretty good, but that doesn't count because the recordings were from before 2000.

coffeeshop 07-23-2008 07:08 AM

I've recently got addicted to Weezer again, remembered how much I love the blue album and Pinkerton after downloading the new album, which after initial listens I am quite enjoying.

Whatsitoosit 07-23-2008 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsherM (Post 500058)
Lol good point. Well, I don't know how I would feel if I weren't a Weezer fan, but I think Red album was a pretty good effort. It at least sounds like they're trying to be original again. Rivers Cuomo's Home Alone Recordings was pretty good, but that doesn't count because the recordings were from before 2000.

Yeah I heard the home recordings were good. I can respect trying different sounds and not trying to replicate past success but to me it sounds like they put more effort into their music on the first two albums and then they said "hey, let's just play straight forward rock n roll... why bust our asses? we already have fans".

Songs like "Greatest man who lived" is an exception, even though that song is a fractured mess I can appreciate it probably took them a while to construct it.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.