I do too count. I count on your mudda.

because OBVIOUSLY a woman's tits are the MAIN FEATURE of a photo and OBVIOUSLY a woman should expect to be ostracized, sexualized, and turned into a commodity for male consumption because OBVIOUSLY just existing is enough to justify a man's objectification of the female form.

because apparently women exist for heterosexual male approval.

give me a goddamn break.

shame on you.

Call him a victim blamer.

:laughing: I think there are better terms to deal with that kind of shit.

I've been just sitting here watching everyone argue about tits. I love when Vanilla posts pictures because this happens, it's great entertainment.

Take a picture showing tits people will comment on tits
Take a picture showing ass people will comment on the ass
Take a picture showing a beard people will comment on the beard
I took a picture of me with a giant jelly baby, people commented on the giant jelly baby.

It's got fuck all to do with any objectification from any sex. People are just commenting on what they can see.

I've been joking as I always do with Ki.. but since we are getting all serious Vanilla directly asked about her lipstick in the post and the question was completely ignored to comment on the cleavage. I assume Vanilla doesn't care because I know her better than when I first joined.

I looked, obviously, but I don't feel the need to bring attention to em every time I see them. I've commented on them in the past.

And now it's been talked about for over 3 pages

Mission accomplished eh vanilla

Keep it going guys, I need something to laugh at in the morning.

It's on topic, what's the problem?