Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   Introductions (https://www.musicbanter.com/introductions/)
-   -   I found out about you less than 90 minutes ago. (https://www.musicbanter.com/introductions/93218-i-found-out-about-you-less-than-90-minutes-ago.html)

The Batlord 02-25-2019 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2045685)
https://66.media.tumblr.com/c74ad82c...1y6uo1_400.jpg

Maybe it's just me, but I think if one's going to have rules, they should be explicit and if need be, detailed.

They're not our rules. We used to allow topless nudity but then a troll reported a bunch of our posts to Google and they threatened to take MB off the front page if we didn't get rid of it all.

rostasi 02-25-2019 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2045685)
...a request to explain an apparent inconsistency...

Really. You’re comparing a single post with a single link that takes you to a
music mix that can be listened to at one’s leisure with a post with huge numbers
of links and graphic variations that you are essentially tied to as a reader. Really.

… and, yes, Delia’s library music work (and Dissevelt too, for that matter)
are representations of what I had said. Only two of many, many works tho.

You’re right about putting you on ignore. I can’t say that I’ve ever done this
with anybody on here - even the most offensive people - but I dread having to
spend so much time and extreme effort going thru such excessive contortions
of prose in all of its lavender glory coupled with an hour of link-clicking and spastic,
flop-all-over-the-page text-scooting that uses occasional coloring that edges toward
disappearing in order to decipher your paint-splattered thought processes.
It’s like having a horrible roommate who pours so much milk into his morning cereal
that it flows out onto the countertop and onto the floor. When you ask him about it,
his answer is that you can just take your time eating it off the floor - or just ignore it.
In other words, a complete self-centered disregard for other people (on a social site too).

DMBFFF 03-01-2019 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2045731)
Really. You’re comparing a single post with a single link that takes you to a
music mix that can be listened to at one’s leisure with a post with huge numbers
of links and graphic variations that you are essentially tied to as a reader. Really.

Huh?

I went to your profile page and clicked a 3-page long thread in which you posted a few 10s of hours of music. Hey, I'm far from complaining. I'm still listening to that Chacarero, TYVM. I tried listening to the first post of your Random Radio thread. 24 minutes into the 3:15:47 Random Radio 013: electrophotomural audio, I thought: "Yeah, he's right. Not quite the music you listen to while sitting in front of a computer." Maybe I'll try again later while doing other stuff.

"tied to as a reader"?

You sound like you were Mr. Spock trying to end a mind meld with Nomad.

Is your habit of taking threads with names such as "women who sing male POV songs by men, without changing the gender-specific pronouns" (where you most likely first replied to a post or posts of mine) that seriously, or listening to a Lez Zeppelin video as if it was one by Jesse Cook?

Do you have similar problems with multi-page threads—say over 10 pages—most filled with links?

If so, you must be having a particularly hard time coping with this century.

I can imagine people who hate heavy metal or even the Stones not clicking covers of such on my thread, but they might like the Beatles. Ditto the reverse. If they listened to 5% of it, I'd be happy. Of course, the more the merrier, but again it isn't required—and I think that's understood—at least by most who venture in.

The big issue then with a lot of people was that I didn't spoil my videos (particularly on that thread). Chalk it up to the act of a n00b. I didn't know. Now I do. Thank you, kind elder—No!—I take that back: you didn't help; you just wagged your finger about the length of my posts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2045731)
Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2045685)
also,
(my bold)
Quote:

The original methods and creation of electronic music was
sound-based and not rhythm-based (as it is today for most
people under 30 years old) and so there’s a generational
difference when it comes to a definition of “electronic music.”
you mean music like this?:

[Doctor Who Theme Tune (original)]

… and, yes, Delia’s library music work (and Dissevelt too, for that matter)
are representations of what I had said. Only two of many, many works tho.

Oh I'm sure she has a lot of stuff where rhythm isn't too important or even present, but that Dr. Who track started with a bit of a beat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2045731)
but I dread having to
spend so much time and extreme effort going thru such excessive contortions
of prose in all of its lavender glory coupled with an hour of link-clicking and spastic,
flop-all-over-the-page text-scooting that uses occasional coloring that edges toward
disappearing in order to decipher your paint-splattered thought processes.

Then don't.

Btw, you too have a way with words.

I myself am converting the Psych Latin Amereekah videos into MP3s to listen all at once on a player.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2045731)
It’s like having a horrible roommate who pours so much milk into his morning cereal
that it flows out onto the countertop and onto the floor. When you ask him about it,
his answer is that you can just take your time eating it off the floor - or just ignore it.

That analogy, or attempt thereof, makes even less sense than the flashlight one on the elph on the shelf thread. He and I had a playful game-of-sort in a political thread—apparently there're not a lot of Bono fans in this forum—and it carried over to his thread. I posted. He said I'm not allowed. I made a statement of presence with a long post. You posted an amusing if yet exaggerated piece of sarcasm, Maria gave up a pic, Neapolitan gave us an altered one, elphenor showed magnanimity, I (I think) returned it, I edited my long post—did some chopping, and now we're friends (at least I consider him one of the good guys).

In what you posted, I might be making a mess, but I haven't used up all the milk. If milk is the content of one's posts, then we all produce milk. You need eat nothing off the floor, you produce your own milk. If the kitchen is this forum, then we aren't roommates because neither of us own it. It belongs to whomever owns this forum, and there are a number of us using it. A better analogy is that we had breakfast at a cafeteria and I overdid it with the milk. Don't worry about it, some employee will clean it up. What it has to do with how people deal with my (alleged at least) verbosity, I don't know. Most ignore it, a few joke about it or say "wtf." You seem the most bothered—unless elphenor is (super) serious about the post he made in the Britney-versus-Nirvana thread.

Another analogy is that I made tea for a number of MB members, half-filling beer mugs with it, and topping them off with half-and-half.

Some joke, "did you put enough milk in the tea?" or "you like your milk with tea," and you complain about it.

Everyone leaves the table and go to another one—maybe take turns making tea. Maybe a few use it as a creamer.

or people share 355 mL cans of pop and I hand out 2 L bottles—"too much."

Quote:

Originally Posted by rostasi (Post 2045731)
In other words, a complete self-centered disregard for other people (on a social site too).

either that or I'm simply verbose at times and/or in the opinion of you (and perhaps others) at times make hard-to-read posts.

Again, don't read them.

I suppose a few are.

Why are you on this site? To post a lot of music for others to listen which you think is good, and that you happen to like it is just a coincidence?

I've listened to several hours of music here that I either don't like, or if it was playing on the radio, I wouldn't turn the station, but neither would I stop everything to give it a good listen. A few, including a few of yours, I have liked. Aside from the semi-joking thread or semi-joking post, I have made attempts at times to constructively add to this site, however flawed, even pathetic, the effort and results may be.

It's further proof that I'm a self-centered jerk (on this very social site). :rolleyes:

The Batlord 03-01-2019 03:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2046282)
You sound like you were Mr. Spock trying to end a mind meld with Nomad.

got em

Lucem Ferre 03-01-2019 10:44 AM

You ever get the feeling that some people just like to hear (or read) themselves speak even if they have nothing to say?

The Batlord 03-01-2019 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2046320)
You ever get the feeling that some people just like to hear (or read) themselves speak even if they have nothing to say?

Oh stop, you're embarrassing me.

https://tse4.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.P...D1l2iuWf4wHaFS

Neapolitan 03-01-2019 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2046282)
Huh?

I went to your profile page and clicked a 3-page long thread in which you posted a few 10s of hours of music. Hey, I'm far from complaining. I'm still listening to that Chacarero, TYVM. I tried listening to the first post of your Random Radio thread. 24 minutes into the 3:15:47 Random Radio 013: electrophotomural audio, I thought: "Yeah, he's right. Not quite the music you listen to while sitting in front of a computer." Maybe I'll try again later while doing other stuff.

"tied to as a reader"?

You sound like you were Mr. Spock trying to end a mind meld with Nomad.

Is your habit of taking threads with names such as "women who sing male POV songs by men, without changing the gender-specific pronouns" (where you most likely first replied to a post or posts of mine) that seriously, or listening to a Lez Zeppelin video as if it was one by Jesse Cook?

Do you have similar problems with multi-page threads—say over 10 pages—most filled with links?

If so, you must be having a particularly hard time coping with this century.

I can imagine people who hate heavy metal or even the Stones not clicking covers of such on my thread, but they might like the Beatles. Ditto the reverse. If they listened to 5% of it, I'd be happy. Of course, the more the merrier, but again it isn't required—and I think that's understood—at least by most who venture in.

The big issue then with a lot of people was that I didn't spoil my videos (particularly on that thread). Chalk it up to the act of a n00b. I didn't know. Now I do. Thank you, kind elder—No!—I take that back: you didn't help; you just wagged your finger about the length of my posts.


Oh I'm sure she has a lot of stuff where rhythm isn't too important or even present, but that Dr. Who track started with a bit of a beat.


Then don't.

Btw, you too have a way with words.

I myself am converting the Psych Latin Amereekah videos into MP3s to listen all at once on a player.


That analogy, or attempt thereof, makes even less sense than the flashlight one on the elph on the shelf thread. He and I had a playful game-of-sort in a political thread—apparently there're not a lot of Bono fans in this forum—and it carried over to his thread. I posted. He said I'm not allowed. I made a statement of presence with a long post. You posted an amusing if yet exaggerated piece of sarcasm, Maria gave up a pic, Neapolitan gave us an altered one, elphenor showed magnanimity, I (I think) returned it, I edited my long post—did some chopping, and now we're friends (at least I consider him one of the good guys).

In what you posted, I might be making a mess, but I haven't used up all the milk. If milk is the content of one's posts, then we all produce milk. You need eat nothing off the floor, you produce your own milk. If the kitchen is this forum, then we aren't roommates because neither of us own it. It belongs to whomever owns this forum, and there are a number of us using it. A better analogy is that we had breakfast at a cafeteria and I overdid it with the milk. Don't worry about it, some employee will clean it up. What it has to do with how people deal with my (alleged at least) verbosity, I don't know. Most ignore it, a few joke about it or say "wtf." You seem the most bothered—unless elphenor is (super) serious about the post he made in the Britney-versus-Nirvana thread.

Another analogy is that I made tea for a number of MB members, half-filling beer mugs with it, and topping them off with half-and-half.

Some joke, "did you put enough milk in the tea?" or "you like your milk with tea," and you complain about it.

Everyone leaves the table and go to another one—maybe take turns making tea. Maybe a few use it as a creamer.

or people share 355 mL cans of pop and I hand out 2 L bottles—"too much."



either that or I'm simply verbose at times and/or in the opinion of you (and perhaps others) at times make hard-to-read posts.

Again, don't read them.

I suppose a few are.

Why are you on this site? To post a lot of music for others to listen which you think is good, and that you happen to like it is just a coincidence?

I've listened to several hours of music here that I either don't like, or if it was playing on the radio, I wouldn't turn the station, but neither would I stop everything to give it a good listen. A few, including a few of yours, I have liked. Aside from the semi-joking thread or semi-joking post, I have made attempts at times to constructively add to this site, however flawed, even pathetic, the effort and results may be.

It's further proof that I'm a self-centered jerk (on this very social site). :rolleyes:

It's "Doctor Who," not "Dr. Who." The main character is known as the Doctor, not the Dr. While I admire those kind of people who have the time and wherewithal to be able to type of lengthy response and speak their mind. You certainly do not have the moral high ground to prance about on your high horse and admonish rostasi while making such an absurd mistake like calling the Doctor "Dr."

DMBFFF 03-08-2019 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 2046394)
It's "Doctor Who," not "Dr. Who." The main character is known as the Doctor, not the Dr. While I admire those kind of people who have the time and wherewithal to be able to type of lengthy response and speak their mind. You certainly do not have the moral high ground to prance about on your high horse and admonish rostasi while making such an absurd mistake like calling the Doctor "Dr."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Doctor_(Doctor_Who)

Such is my ignorance.
Thanks for the correction.

Generally "Dr." is less verbose than "Doctor"—some folks were yammering;

and I'll maintain the theme song starts with a good beat.



a bit longer than my previous embed—2:36

Spoiler for Doctor Who (1963) - Original Theme music video:


Yeah, this has beats too—my first time hearing this too, people.

Spoiler for Delia Derbyshire - Ziwzih Ziwzih OO-OO-OO (1968):

DMBFFF 03-08-2019 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2046282)
The big issue then with a lot of people was that I didn't spoil my videos (particularly on that thread). Chalk it up to the act of a n00b. I didn't know. Now I do. Thank you, kind elder—No!—I take that back: you didn't help; you just wagged your finger about the length of my posts.

Actually, I take the bold back.

rostasi did help.

DMBFFF 12-29-2019 04:37 PM

I was banned for 10 days in October 2019.

I'm still kinda ticked—I know: my problem.

Still, I'm thinking among my possible resolutions for 2020:

1. post no more than 10x posts in MB.
2. post no links to YouTube (nor embed)—not even in quotes—in MB: stick it to the Advameg-YouTube-Google cartel.
3. occasionally PM to some of the many cool folks here.
4. lurk a lot—appropriate ideas for other places on the net I go to.
5. spend more time seeking less restrictive alternatives to MB.

The Batlord 12-29-2019 04:48 PM

Nobody cares about you being a spammer or whatever anymore and we all just talk about what movies we just watched.

Frownland 12-29-2019 04:53 PM

I watched The Interview (1998) again yesterday and it's still one of the best dialogue-driven films that I've ever seen. Hugo Weaving really takes the already strong screenplay to another level.

Neapolitan 12-29-2019 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMBFFF (Post 2097830)
I was banned for 10 days in October 2019.

I'm still kinda ticked—I know: my problem.

Still, I'm thinking among my possible resolutions for 2020:

1. post no more than 10x posts in MB.
2. post no links to YouTube (nor embed)—not even in quotes—in MB: stick it to the Advameg-YouTube-Google cartel.
3. occasionally PM to some of the many cool folks here.
4. lurk a lot—appropriate ideas for other places on the net I go to.
5. spend more time seeking less restrictive alternatives to MB.

Sounds like a solid plan.

ziggywas 12-29-2019 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frownland (Post 2097837)
I watched The Interview (1998) again yesterday and it's still one of the best dialogue-driven films that I've ever seen. Hugo Weaving really takes the already strong screenplay to another level.

seems interesting. This guy is a good actor! Took me some time to realize, i think i was prejudiced because the first and second time i saw him was in huge blockbuster movies..

DMBFFF 12-29-2019 06:57 PM

Hi guys.


Okay, I might re-post some of what was removed should I muster up the effort.

I'm taking the one-account rule seriously, whereas on the other forum, I might create +40 accounts (have only one currently).




looks promising ...,

https://external-content.duckduckgo....gif&f=1&nofb=1






Quote:

Originally Posted by Neapolitan (Post 2097842)
Sounds like a solid plan.

Thanks.

and thanks again for this. :)

DMBFFF 12-31-2019 06:31 AM

12-31-2019, 14:31 PM
12-29-2019, 23:31

1 day, 15 hours

my first post in months.

1 day, 15 hours, later: 19 posts, including this.

I haven't been banned, though a few of my posts were flamboyant and I linked to posts I made in the other forum, as well as WP.

This is good.

Still, let's see if I could adopt what I'm considering for 2020. Not a vow, but see how easy it would be.




At any rate, Happy New Years to you wonderful people! :)

Marie Monday 12-31-2019 07:19 AM

Happy new year to you too, you funny weirdo <3

DMBFFF 03-25-2021 02:00 AM

I'm back. :)
 
03-25-2021, 09:00 AM
10-18-2020, 02:27 AM (my last post until now)

5 months, 7 days, 6 hours, 27 minutes (I think)

I did it, nor was it too difficult.

Still, it's good to be back.


Good morning/day/whatever to you wonderful people! :)

adidasss 03-25-2021 03:19 AM

Well, just scrolled through this thread, seems bizarre out of context.

But urm, welcome back? Not sure what kept landing you in trouble, apart from wall of text posts...:D

DMBFFF 03-25-2021 04:14 AM

spam: I posted about my activities elsewhere after, I think, after a few-months absence. I was banned for about 10 days in October 2019. I was a bit ticked, so I thought I'd sort of take a year off—maybe look for alternatives to MB. Before that I got a warning for posting a topless pic—even though the rules don't forbid it.

adidasss 03-25-2021 05:51 AM

And what were you banned for?

Marie Monday 03-25-2021 10:49 AM

Welcome back mate
https://i.imgur.com/4TDWVgk.gif

DMBFFF 03-25-2021 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adidasss (Post 2167352)
And what were you banned for?

spam, or that's what thon said—and only a few posts at that—maybe only one—in Oct 2019. The ban was short, maybe 2 weeks, but I was still ticked—hence the time-out.




Quote:

Originally Posted by Marie Monday (Post 2167382)

It's how I feel. :D

Thanks, coolest mod on this site. :D


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.