Hardcore dancing is the #1 symptom of homosexuality

That's weird I always listen to it in 3 parts becuase to be honest pt. 2 is my least favorite one.

The ****? You mean it was actually yet another massively long, exasperatingly repetitive song? How does that make it any better? "I'm off to listen to another brick in the wall" "ok see you in AN HOUR. Don't let your brain bleed out your eyes from mind rotting boredom that spontaneously occurs to people listening to horrendously long and unprogressive songs".

If we apply this logic, we realise that Brittany Spears version of "Oops I Did It Again" was an absolutely AMAZING song, after all it was covered by Bodom, and we all know bands would NEVER cover a crap song or, if they did, they wouldn't be able to make it a good song. I mean, bloody good logic you've got going there. Though I never took you for a Spears fan ...

To be fair I couldn't give a damn how much it's been played on the radio, because that only every chugs out ****ty music over here hence I don't listen to it. I've certainly not listened to the song to sickening point, because I've listened to it enough times to know it sucks and then avoided it like the plague.

funny, I always assumed it was another man's penis in your mouth.

boy, I'm behind the times.

Horrendously long? Try 3:14 on pt. 1, 1:55 on HDOUL, and 4:03 on Pt. 2, which somehow equals an hour? I came up with 9:12... Unprogressive, what are you and idiot have you ever listened to all 3 parts? It is extremely progressive, part 1 has some of the greatest guitar work on the whole album of the wall, HDOUL starts off with the sound of a helicopter that sounds like its landing right ****ing in front of you, then goes off to another progressive run with some great lyrics, which leads into pt. 2 which is all you have probably ever heard which quite frankly, seems out of place when its not played with the other 2 parts before it, and again pt. 2 has some really great guitar work in it as well, something that the Korn version definetely lacked being that their guitarist doesnt know his head from his ass to come up anything great like that, let alone even be able to copy it. You really dont know what progressive rock is, do you?



Trust me, Korn would not be able to get away with covering a ****ty song, they knew damn well that another brick in the wall was a great song, and that they were basically guarenteed listeners becuase of that, which = guaranteed $$$. Bands like Korn are in it all for the money, not to share talented music to the public like music used to be back in the day.



Talk about dumb logic, you're saying you decipher how good a song is by how much it gets played on the radio?:laughing: That's just plain stupid. Most of the greater songs of the past made it to the top of the charts and were played all the time on the radio, reason being that they were great tunes. Pink Floyd's dark side of the moon stayed on the billboard for 943 weeks I think it was, is that to say it was bad music? Really, stupid logic, but why should I expect anything other than that from you?

:( i hxc dance

*sigh* what i meant was all that gets played on the radio (ive noticed) is part 2 it just gets heard more and by itself.

Nuff said ;)

I didn't say progressive rock I said progressive. If you're too much of a gobby **** to pick up the dictionary, unprogressive - their **** all sounds the same.

They've said that have they? There's absolutely no chance that they enjoy producing their music?

Just because it sounds **** to you doesn't mean the bands don't like doing it.

Learn how to read and then tell me precisely where I said that.

Actually, considering it's you I guess I'll have to dumb it down.

Radio is ****.
I do not listen to radio.
Because radio is **** and I don't listen to it, it doesn't affect me if they're playing a song 24/7 or once in a blue moon, because I won't hear it.
I base my decisions of what music I like in accordance with listening to stuff when I want to.