It used to be much more interesting.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?...oldid=61387632

However, somebody saw fit to remove all of the interesting features I'd inserted into the article.

^ I like your version better. :love:

Ah well. Something about my use of "We" in my argument means that they don't want to discuss it and it's gonna be deleted anyway, from what I can gather.

Nice to know that after about the 5 millionth revision I FINALLY get a mention.

the "Urban Legend" i belive it was called

Nahh it was more like 'this twat is now a mod ' or something

hahahaha Cycle through the newer version, the additions are funny

there should be quite afew people making it better for our sakes, if so we can put abit about most of the regulars up there or something even if they don't always post

We should use this thread to suggest our own versions of what the wiki would say, and then have some sort of consensus vote on it. I liked the idea I found in one of the versions of bio's on all the regulars. We could all write bio's on whoever the hell we wanted and then post them all up there.

And if they delete it, who cares.

i have the story of MB somewhere on here.


EDIT: found: http://musicbanter.com/showthread.php?t=11836