Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Assignment help!!!! (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/19732-assignment-help.html)

under 12-05-2006 05:04 PM

Assignment help!!!!
 
I'm doing an assignment for school, I have to think of interview questions and right now I can't think of any...

can anyone give me some good interview questions? Remember this is for school so nothing PG 13.

The topic is World Literature and Poetry

Merkaba 12-05-2006 05:05 PM

Whats the topic?

under 12-05-2006 05:06 PM

I have to ask her questions on World Literature and Poetry because it's for my English teacher.

tdoc210 12-05-2006 05:10 PM

thats a ****ing stupid assingment

anyways, ask ehat value classic literature from the 19th century has today, and how the times have changed, thus making such literture outdated but neecerery.

ask her to describe her feelings when someone says only the bad poets live the poem, and the good poets, can only write them

under 12-05-2006 05:11 PM

Oh, thanks those are some really good questions...

I agree the assignment is stupid...I got to choose my own topic though so yeah...

Merkaba 12-05-2006 05:13 PM

Poetry was never my strong point. Nor literature...or the World come to think of it;)

How does literature differ around the world, from country to country?

Thats all I've got. Good luck writing this one man, I did my research in high school on SARS and music history lol, far easier than bloody poetry!

under 12-05-2006 05:14 PM

Thanks, it's all good. One question, is one more question I need to finish this stupid thing

tdoc210 12-05-2006 05:20 PM

How, in your opinion, did 19th century writers think their work would be represented, or copied in the present, did they think their effect would be subtle or large, sucha s in the writings of charles ****ins, and upton sinclair.

under 12-05-2006 05:23 PM

Is that question to me or Merkaba?

Well in my opinion, I think there work would be represented as a large effect because when people see what writing was like than, and what it's like now...they'll see how much they have to learn and how much they already know. For Charles ****ens, his writings are good but his writing hasn't exactly made the biggest effect. I'm reading "Great Expectations" by Charles ****ens, and I don't think that from what I read would really make a big effect in what the literature is like today.

tdoc210 12-05-2006 05:36 PM

..its for your teacher/...

under 12-05-2006 05:45 PM

Lol sorry....you said...."how in your opinion" so I thought it was to one of us......i'll use that one. Thank ya

[MERIT] 12-05-2006 05:53 PM

ask 'em if they think Poe or Frost was an old school street poet like Tupac:laughing:

sleepy jack 12-05-2006 05:56 PM

Dickens is pretty boring, I barely made it through Great Expectations, I pity you Robert.

Anyway back to what I wanted to say, tdoc you need to quit swearing every 10 seconds it makes you look like an idiot.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mamagarmr (Post 308285)
thats a ****ing stupid assingment

anyways, ask ehat value classic literature from the 19th century has today, and how the times have changed, thus making such literture outdated but neecerery.

ask her to describe her feelings when someone says only the bad poets live the poem, and the good poets, can only write them

Most good literature isn't "outdated", look at Catcher In The Rye that was published in 51 and its still very popular and relevant, and Animal Farm was published in '45 its still great. And all of Stephen King's stuff is still good as hell and he started in 74.

A lot of modern literature sucks, its mostly filled with sex (eroticism in books = pointless) and trendy pop culture crap, I doubt most authors today will be remembered for a long time unlike Shakespeare and Mark Twain.

And that poet question is also pretty stupid, you're a bad poet because you've dealt with what you write about? According to that logic, a 13 year old writing about cutting but never laid a knife to his wrist is better then a poem Emily Dickinson writing about nature.

Your questions suck.

tdoc210 12-05-2006 06:18 PM

your logic sucks

read the context.. good writers..never experience, what bad writers do, because bad writers dont have time to do the good writing, but good writers can write about anything, and make it seem good.

you don't get the questions

sleepy jack 12-05-2006 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mamagarmr (Post 308310)
your logic sucks

read the context.. good writers..never experience, what bad writers do, because bad writers dont have time to do the good writing, but good writers can write about anything, and make it seem good.

you don't get the questions

Maybe if you go back to school and learn about grammar, spelling and sentence structure I would.

Also, that still makes 0 sense, just because you're a good writer doesn't mean you can write about anything and it will be good.

tdoc210 12-05-2006 06:20 PM

Most good literature isn't "outdated", look at Catcher In The Rye that was published in 51 and its still very popular and relevant, and Animal Farm was published in '45 its still great. And all of Stephen King's stuff is still good as hell and he started in 74.

hence..19th century..industrial.. error, besides cathcer in the rye is boring humdrub for scene kids who jack off to it.
i'd hardly call 74' old
with ****ens it is out dated because..it deals with a period of time we are no longer in

tdoc210 12-05-2006 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crowquill (Post 308311)
Maybe if you go back to school and learn about grammar, spelling and sentence structure I would.

im not going to use grammar on the internet

sleepy jack 12-05-2006 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mamagarmr (Post 308313)
im not going to use grammar on the internet

Then proceed to look like more of a moron.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mamagarmr (Post 308312)
Most good literature isn't "outdated", look at Catcher In The Rye that was published in 51 and its still very popular and relevant, and Animal Farm was published in '45 its still great. And all of Stephen King's stuff is still good as hell and he started in 74.

hence..19th century..industrial.. error, besides cathcer in the rye is boring humdrub for scene kids who jack off to it.
i'd hardly call 74' old
with ****ens it is out dated because..it deals with a period of time we are no longer in

Obviously the catcher in the rye is only for scene kids seeing as its been successful over the years...and you know the 50s, 60s, 70s, and 80s were all just FILLED with scene kids, and when its taught in english classes everywhere and is a very respect book. Don't be an idiot.

And use the dictionary, Dickens isn't outdated because its not in this time period, by that logic all wizard dragon fantasy books are outdated even though they were put out in 06.

And for the record, outdated doesn't = bad.

Do you even know what you're talking about?

tdoc210 12-05-2006 06:28 PM

oh for ****s sake.. im referring to the industrial revolution dip****, thats what ****ens wrote about, along with social unrest, and innequalities in england.

The Industrial revolution is over, thus the material is outdated, never said it wasnt any good. For he was trying to intiate change through his writings. Like george Orwells 1984.

Besides Oliver Twist, rips the **** out of Catcher in the rye.

sleepy jack 12-05-2006 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mamagarmr (Post 308316)
oh for ****s sake.. im referring to the industrial revolution dip****, thats what ****ens wrote about, along with social unrest, and innequalities in england.

The Industrial revolution is over, thus the material is outdated, never said it wasnt any good. For he was trying to intiate change through his writings. Like george Orwells 1984.

Besides Oliver Twist, rips the **** out of Catcher in the rye.

That last statement is subjective, I prefer the Catcher In The Rye over everything Dickens has done.

I don't see whats wrong with catcher in the rye, all you've said is, it isn't as good as Oliver Twist (subjective) and its only like by scene kids (bullshit).

And question, what is the point of proving its outdated? If you aren't using it as a negative statement, then thats like going "Dickens last name started with d".

And hey, you'd better watch who you're calling dipshit I can warn you if I cared enough. Insults aren't tolerated, and doing it right in front of a mods face is pretty stupid.

under 12-05-2006 06:39 PM

Thanks to people who actually gave me questions about the assignment. I finally finished it.

Oh and Catcher in the Rye is a really good book. Ethan I know what you mean with Great Expectations, the only reason why I read it is because I had to do a report on Charles....it was pretty boring....

hmm....thinks of a new thread ooooh got one


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.


© 2003-2024 Advameg, Inc.