Music Banter

Music Banter (https://www.musicbanter.com/)
-   The Lounge (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/)
-   -   Ink (https://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/27908-ink.html)

likuidcoka 12-15-2009 10:06 AM

Why post fake tatt pics and then get all offended when someone calls you out on them?
YOU can tell that $hit is photoshopped.

Im not gonna step on eggshells for some Lil girls who cant handle what they dont wanna hear.
And like I stated before,where in the post did I call that Girl RETARDED?? Please show me.

LoathsomePete 12-15-2009 10:18 AM

Quote:

we will not tolerate rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, trolling, or purposeless inflammatory posts.

Read more: http://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/31...#ixzz0Zm6P9oZ7
Quote:

I call bull**** on those tatts.^^ WTF would anyone even fake post tatt pics?=/

The last one is definately real and retarted too.

Read more: http://www.musicbanter.com/lounge/27...#ixzz0Zm7RT9Hp
You flagrantly posted insulting comments for something you have no way of proving, you continued to push your asinine opinion even though other members called you out on it, and even after a warning you still continue to argue it. If you want to continue posting on these forums then I would highly suggest dropping the issue.

likuidcoka 12-15-2009 10:22 AM

Yeah, Ill drop the issue.

I already said what I wanted to say anyhow.:laughing:

ON topic: THIs is a REAL tattoo on my mans hairy leg.
http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/c...ic080809_1.jpg

Freebase Dali 12-15-2009 01:23 PM

Likuid...
Here is a picture Paloma posted in the Members Gallery that clearly can't be mistaken as 'fake':

http://i9.tinypic.com/6pejoky.jpg

It's a new tattoo. You can even see the red skin around the ink.
What you're accusing as a photoshopped fake tat in her other version of this picture is actually just a picture quality issue, and it shouldn't have taken much observation to realize that everything in those 'fake' pictures were afflicted by the same degraded quality, and the black simply stands out due to high contrast. That's typical of webcam photos, or really bad processing.


You have anything to say about that?

helikonia 12-15-2009 01:38 PM

meh...

http://b3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/0...15045053_l.jpg

look at my yellow finger!

likuidcoka 12-15-2009 02:04 PM

why is it yellow?^^

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 785051)
Likuid...
Here is a picture Paloma posted in the Members Gallery that clearly can't be mistaken as 'fake':

http://i9.tinypic.com/6pejoky.jpg

It's a new tattoo. You can even see the red skin around the ink.
What you're accusing as a photoshopped fake tat in her other version of this picture is actually just a picture quality issue, and it shouldn't have taken much observation to realize that everything in those 'fake' pictures were afflicted by the same degraded quality, and the black simply stands out due to high contrast. That's typical of webcam photos, or really bad processing.


You have anything to say about that?

:o: ooops..MY BAD.

well damm, I dint see that pic!

My apologies to Paloma.

Freebase Dali 12-15-2009 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by likuidcoka (Post 785066)
:o: ooops..MY BAD.

well damm, I dint see that pic!

My apologies to Paloma.


The tat you mistakenly bashed reads:

"Heavy words are so lightly thrown".

Kinda like poetic justice in this situation, I think.

likuidcoka 12-15-2009 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Freebase Dali (Post 785109)
The tat you mistakenly bashed reads:

"Heavy words are so lightly thrown".

Kinda like poetic justice in this situation, I think.

the tatt i bashed ha!

-smh-

Yes i know:(

Sorry for all the ruccus i started in here folks.

Sansa Stark 12-15-2009 03:34 PM

Apology not accepted.

But thanks to the others for your defense.

right-track 12-15-2009 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paloma (Post 785133)
Apology not accepted.

But thanks to the others for your defense.

That's a shame.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.


© 2003-2025 Advameg, Inc.