What if Music Banter is just a dream in The Batlord's head?

What if The Batlord is just a dream in Music Banter's head?

Somehow I don't think it would work like that. If the universe is governed by math, from the bounce of a ball, to the movement of a galaxy, then you are also governed by those same laws, and if it's impossible for anything to act differently than what is essentially preordained by mathematical fate, then even the Big Bang can't act any differently, which opens up the possibility that if the Big Bang was the result of a former universe imploding or whatever, then the Big Bang that started the former universe would have happened exactly like this the one did created ours. So there might conceivably be a you from some extremely distant past who was exactly like you and did everything that you've done, are doing, and will do.

Made me think of this for some reason.

No. Multiple universe models are generally discouraged for the same reasons that people don’t believe in God: neither can be seen or observed so it’s silly to believe in them.

Yet, saying you don't believe in it is basically the same concept. You have no proof that it doesn't exist, so how can you take the stance that it doesn't if you have no proof?

Isn't the lack of proof reason enough?

I didn’t say either of them can’t be suggested though.

A certain type of black hole is theorized to contain wormholes to possibly another universe, but we’ve never been close enough to one of these black holes to see it. A facsimile of this is shown in Interstellar, but the black hole in that movie was purely hypothetical.

The burden of proof lies upon the maker of positive claims. I do not believe is not a positive claim, it is a reaction to the lack of evidence.

For instance:

"I do not believe in god" is not a positive claim. It is simply an acknowledgement of the lack of concrete, evidential reason for belief.

"I believe that there is no god" is a positive claim. For this statement to be supported, you would have to provide evidence for why a god does not or could not exist.

This seems a lot like semantics, but it's actually a pretty important part of logic.

These are definitely all very good points. I'm not really choosing sides on whether or not something is true. This type of thing has always interested me and it boggles my mind that something like this could happen. If any proof were to arise, I do think that our minds wouldn't really be able to process the information.