Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2061938)

I’m not willing to entertain discussion with people who don’t understand cause and effect.

It’s true than theories like panpsychism or consciousness not even existing are far fetched. It’s a matter of grasping at straws to help contemplate a very bewildering question but there’s a prerequisite of things you have to understand before you’re ready to have those discussions. The indisputable impossibility of free will must be understood and accepted before you can move on.

It’s true that me entertaining the arguments of people who can’t grasp this caused a circular and stupid unproductive conversation.

I’ll discuss the nature of consciousness and self with Batlord but I’m not having these discussions with people who aren’t ready anymore.

Originally Posted by WWWP (Post 2061976)

hard determinism =/= a predetermined universe

anyway the only thing worth worshipping is the utter chaos and absurdity of it all

Originally Posted by Plankton (Post 2061950)

Originally Posted by Lucem Ferre (Post 2061966)

So basically you were cornered with information that you couldn't retort so you're doing all that you can to avoid admitting that you don't know.

Again, you argue like a Christian defending theism. Using the same exact 'logic'.

Originally Posted by Doug McClasky (Post 2062037)

It's hard to argue against vague, meaningless bull****.

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2062038)

*Flashback to special education teaching*

Originally Posted by OccultHawk (Post 2062038)

No matter how barebones and simply I broke it down I got the same response and accusations. *Flashback to special education teaching*