I mean really? I always had fun messing with Chula but I always thought it was in good fun, or at least it was just only internet douchebaggery. It was clearly un-mod-...erately on Frown's part, but it still felt within the bounds of internet fun. But I'm enough of a **** that I won't pretend that I'd know where the boundaries are.

Frown: Hey Chula, your mentally ill son is a loser.

Chula: Wow, you're an asshole.

Frown: Stop with the personal attacks, or I'll ban you.

Oh yeah no that was seriously a ban worthy offense. Like, even after all this time it's ban worthy to the point that he could still be banned for it and I don't think anyone would complain. If it had been me to say it I'd be gone forever absolutely no question and I wouldn't even feel bad about it. That's like instant perma-ban ****.

I went there and didn't get banned.

Sorry Batty, I have no reason to say Frownland is a bad mod https://img62.imageshack.us/img62/5581/fbj4fbjpg.png

Im sure hes said mean s*it though, I have too, so have you.

Ja this happened in a vacuum, none of the mods yelled at me for it at all, and I have not stopped doing it since then :rolleyes:.

That **** was truly ****ing vicious

Kind of a pathetic strawman, tbh. You wanted an example of a rule you enforce that you yourself broke, and you got one. I didn't say whether the community thought it was contextually understandable or not, because that's not the point, and not what you asked for.

You also missed the word unsolicited, which is always when I throw out the warning. But yes, you are right on that one. At least I that joke be after I saw how knotted the panties got.

And yet you're still a mod. What does one have to do to get de-modded? Do you have to post pics of Chula's daughter's head superimposed on a mutilated corpse?